Menu
Recruiting NCT06960577

Perioperative Durvalumab With Neoadjuvant ddMVAC or Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NIAGARA-2)

Phase III Interventional Urinary Bladder Neoplasms Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Methotrexate Vinblastine

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Durvalumab, Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Methotrexate, Vinblastine. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Italy +2
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Phase IIIb, Open-label, Single-arm, Global Study of Perioperative Durvalumab With Neoadjuvant ddMVAC or Gem/Cis in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NIAGARA-2)

Overview

The Phase IIIb NIAGARA-2 study aims to expand on the data from the Phase III NIAGARA study by investigating perioperative durvalumab in combination with investigator-selected cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (either ddMVAC or gemcitabine/cisplatin) in a clinical practice setting.

Detailed description

Not provided

Interventions

  • Drug Durvalumab
    Anti- PD-L1 Antibody.
  • Drug Methotrexate
    Chemotherapy agent.
  • Drug Vinblastine
    Chemotherapy agent
  • Drug Doxorubicin
    Chemotherapy agent
  • Drug Cisplatin
    Chemotherapy agent
  • Drug Durvalumab
    Anti- PD-L1 Antibody
  • Drug Gemcitabine
    Chemotherapy agent
  • Drug Cisplatin
    Chemotherapy agent

Primary outcome measures

  • The safety of neoadjuvant durvalumab combined with ddMVAC or gem/cis prior to radical cystectomy (RC). [Time frame: Up to 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • The safety and tolerability of perioperative durvalumab combined with ddMVAC or gem/cis. [Time frame: Up to 2 years]
  • The efficacy of perioperative durvalumab combined with ddMVAC or gem/cis in terms of event-free survival (EFS). [Time frame: Up to 3 years]
  • The efficacy of perioperative durvalumab combined with ddMVAC or gem/cis in terms of disease-free survival (DFS). [Time frame: Up to 3 years]
  • The efficacy of perioperative durvalumab combined with ddMVAC or gem/cis in terms of OS. [Time frame: Up to 3 years]
  • The efficacy of neoadjuvant durvalumab combined with ddMVAC or gem/cis followed by RC in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR). [Time frame: Up to 3 years]
  • The efficacy of neoadjuvant durvalumab combined with ddMVAC or gem/cis followed by RC in terms of pathologic downstaging (pDS). [Time frame: Up to 3 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants with clinical tumour stage T2-T4aN0/1M0 or T1N1M0 with transitional or mixed transitional cell histology
  • Patients must be planning to undergo radical cystectomy
  • Patients who have not received prior systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy for treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer
  • ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
  • Minimum life expectancy of 12 weeks at first dose of study medication

Exclusion criteria

  • Evidence of lymph node (N2-N3) or metastatic (M1) disease
  • Inoperable tumour(s) with fixation to the pelvic wall on clinical examination
  • Prior exposure to immune-mediated therapy including, but not limited to, other anti CTLA-4, anti-PD 1, anti-PD L1 and anti-PD-L2 antibodies, excluding Bacillus Calmette-Guérin
  • Current or prior use of immunosuppressive medication within 14 days before the first dose of durvalumab
  • Any concomitant medication known to be contraindicated to the chemotherapy (ddMVAC or gem/cis).
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 20 centers
  • Research Site — Angers
  • Research Site — Angers
  • Research Site — Bordeaux
  • Research Site — Chambray-lès-Tours
  • Research Site — Dijon
  • Research Site — Lille
  • Research Site — Lyon
  • Research Site — Marseille
  • … and 12 more centers
Spain · 10 centers
  • Research Site — Barcelona
  • Research Site — Barcelona
  • Research Site — Barcelona
  • Research Site — Barcelona
  • Research Site — Girona
  • Research Site — Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
  • Research Site — Lugo
  • Research Site — Madrid
  • … and 2 more centers
Australia · 9 centers
  • Research Site — Chermside
  • Research Site — Elizabeth Vale
  • Research Site — Heidelberg
  • Research Site — Hong Kong
  • Research Site — Kogarah
  • Research Site — Macquarie University
  • Research Site — Murdoch
  • Research Site — Port Macquarie
  • … and 1 more center
Brazil · 8 centers
  • Research Site — Barretos
  • Research Site — Jaú
  • Research Site — Natal
  • Research Site — Porto Alegre
  • Research Site — Rio de Janeiro
  • Research Site — Santo André
  • Research Site — São José do Rio Preto
  • Research Site — São Paulo
Canada · 6 centers
  • Research Site — Hamilton
  • Research Site — London
  • Research Site — Ottawa
  • Research Site — Montreal
  • Research Site — Québec
  • Research Site — Sherbrooke
Italy · 3 centers
  • Research Site — Florence
  • Research Site — Orbassano
  • Research Site — Roma
Netherlands · 3 centers
  • Research Site — Amsterdam
  • Research Site — Nijmegen
  • Research Site — Rotterdam

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06960577 · D933RC00002

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗