Menu
Recruiting NCT03521648

Database for the Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of BPH Treatment

Observational Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: PAE, TURP, Other.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Male.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Switzerland
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

This registry study aims to collect data on efficacy and safety of different treatments of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-LUTS).

Detailed description

This registry study aims to collect data on efficacy and safety of different treatments of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-LUTS).

Clinical, patient reported and imaging data that are assessed in clinical routine will be prospectively collected. All patients that are treated for BPE / BPH-LUTS at our institution will be included if they provide written informed consent.

This registry enables us to compare novel treatment option (e.g. prostatic artery embolization; PAE) to established interventions (e.g., TURP, HoLEP, open prostatectomy, ThuLEP, Thulium laser vaporization, TUIP) regarding safety and efficacy.

Interventions

  • Procedure PAE
    Prostatic artery embolization
  • Procedure TURP
    Transurethral resection of the prostate
  • Procedure Other
    Other surgical procedures for BPH treatment including holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, open prostatectomy, thulium laser vaporization, resection or enucleation, transurethral incision of the prostate

Primary outcome measures

  • Reduction of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [Time frame: baseline to 1 year]
  • Changes of free urinary flow rate [Time frame: baseline to 1 year]
  • Changes of post void residual urine [Time frame: baseline to 1 year]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Reduction of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks]
  • Reduction of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks]
  • Reduction of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [Time frame: baseline to 6 months]
  • Reduction of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [Time frame: baseline to 2 years]
  • Reduction of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [Time frame: baseline to 5 years]
  • Changes of free urinary flow rate [Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks]
  • Changes of free urinary flow rate [Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks]
  • Changes of free urinary flow rate [Time frame: baseline to 6 months]
  • Changes of free urinary flow rate [Time frame: baseline to 2 years]
  • Changes of free urinary flow rate [Time frame: baseline to 5 years]
  • Changes of post void residual urine [Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks]
  • Changes of post void residual urine [Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients treated for BPH / LUTS / prostatic obstruction at the urological department of KSSG
  • Patient age ≥ 18 years
  • Informed consent provided

Exclusion criteria

-Cognitive impairment not allowing Informed Consent or adequate data assessment.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Case-control

Study locations

Switzerland · 1 center
  • St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital — Sankt Gallen

Identifiers

NCT: NCT03521648 · CTU P-17/006

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗