Меню
Набор по приглашению NCT05655273

Conversion of Maintenance Prograf to Envarsus in Liver Transplant Recipients

Фаза IV С лечением Liver Transplant Rejection Immune System Suppression

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Prograf, Envarsus.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Liver Transplant Rejection, Immune System Suppression. Базовые параметры: 18 лет — 99 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Канада
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Prograf/Envarsus Conversion Study in Liver Transplant Recipients to Improve Side Effects, Adherence and Quality of Life: a Single-centre Randomized Controlled Trial

Обзор

Prograf and Envarsus are two different formulations of Tacrolimus which is used as an immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. Prograf is currently used as part of the standard immunosuppression regimen for LT recipients at UHN. This study will compare the use of Prograf and Envarsus and their effects on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects, and patient adherence. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.

Подробное описание

Tacrolimus (Prograf ©) has become part of the standard of care for patients receiving solid organ transplants and is part of the immunosuppressive protocol (along with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil \[CellCept ©\]) used by liver transplant recipients at University Health Network (UHN). Tacrolimus is associated with several toxicities including renal injury, tremor, pancreatic islet β-cell injury (leading to diabetes) and hyperlipidemia. As a result of these potential toxicities, careful therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is a key component of post-transplant management. Tacrolimus trough levels are known to correlate with total tacrolimus exposure, as shown from formal pharmacokinetic assessments. Accordingly, trough serum concentrations of tacrolimus are measured routinely in all recipients and are used to guide dosing. The Prograf formulation of tacrolimus has a short serum half-life and must be dosed twice daily to maintain therapeutic serum concentrations. Further, Prograf administration results in a high peak tacrolimus level. Peak tacrolimus levels have been shown to correlate with toxicity; thus, avoidance of high peaks may be desirable to minimize tacrolimus toxicity.

Envarsus is an extended-release formulation of tacrolimus that provides similar drug exposure to tacrolimus at a 30% lower dose but with a once daily dosing regimen. Envarsus dosing also results in a lower peak tacrolimus level compared to Prograf. In this way, it is hoped that Envarsus may provide similar therapeutic efficacy as Prograf but with fewer adverse effects. In addition, the simpler dosing regimen is expected to enhance patient adherence and quality of life.

The present study is aimed at evaluating the impact of a switch from Prograf to Envarsus on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects and adherence. It hypothesizes that once daily Envarsus can be substituted at reduced daily dose for twice daily Prograf in stable liver transplant recipients without clinically meaningful changes in liver allograft function while reducing tacrolimus side effects, reducing cumulative daily dose of the drug and increasing adherence to treatment and quality of life.The results of this study have the potential to change current practice. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.

Вмешательства

  • Препарат Prograf
    Participants randomized to the Prograf (control) arm will continue with their current twice daily dosing of Prograf.
  • Препарат Envarsus
    Participants randomized to Envarsus arm will have their current daily dose of Prograf converted to once-daily Envarsus dose according to the following ratio: 0.7 x the current daily Prograf dose. Envarsus is available in 3 dose strengths- 0.75mg, 1.0mg, and 4.0mg. The actual dose of Envarsus will be rounded to an amount that can be administered using the above tablet strengths.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Change in AST levels [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 12]
  • Change in ALT levels [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 12]
  • Change in ALP levels [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 12]
  • Change in Bilirubin blood levels [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 12]
  • Change in tacrolimus trough levels [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 12]
  • Change in overall daily dose of tacrolimus [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 12]
Вторичные конечные точки (12)
  • Change in Systolic Blood Pressure [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
  • Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
  • Change in Renal function (eGFR) [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
  • Change in tremor severity (for subset of patients who report significant tremor at baseline) [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
  • Change in glycemic control (HbA1c) [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
  • Change in lipid profile [Срок оценки: Baseline to week 24 and baseline to week 48]
  • Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' Pain Interference Bank 2.0 [Срок оценки: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
  • Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Bank 1.0 [Срок оценки: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
  • Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Anxiety Bank 1.0 [Срок оценки: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
  • Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Depression Bank 1.0 [Срок оценки: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
  • Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Global Health Scale version 1.2 [Срок оценки: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
  • Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Fatigue bank 1.0 [Срок оценки: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Adult (>18 years) prevalent liver transplant recipient
  • >12 months after liver transplant
  • Prograf-based maintenance immunosuppression with targeted tacrolimus trough level of 5-10 ug/L
  • Stable liver allograft function (defined as ASL \& ALT <30, Bilirubin <20 \& ALP<150 at baseline visit or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
  • Stable renal function (creatinine < 180 µmol/l and eGFR > 40 ml/min) at baseline visit (or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
  • No episode of acute rejection within 6 months of baseline visit
  • Elevated creatinine (defined as >ULN) OR Significant symptoms (by patient self-report) potentially associated with tacrolimus (eg. tremor, difficulty to concentrate, insomnia) OR difficulty to adhere to a twice daily regimen

Критерии исключения

  • Multiorgan transplant;
  • severe intercurrent illness;
  • severe cognitive impairment (all as determined by clinical team);
  • unwilling to consent.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Открытое
Основная цель
Лечение

Центры проведения

Канада · 1 центр
  • Toronto General Hospital — Toronto

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT05655273 · 22-5210

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗