Conversion of Maintenance Prograf to Envarsus in Liver Transplant Recipients
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Prograf, Envarsus.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Liver Transplant Rejection, Immune System Suppression. Basic parameters: 18 years — 99 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Canada
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Prograf/Envarsus Conversion Study in Liver Transplant Recipients to Improve Side Effects, Adherence and Quality of Life: a Single-centre Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Prograf and Envarsus are two different formulations of Tacrolimus which is used as an immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. Prograf is currently used as part of the standard immunosuppression regimen for LT recipients at UHN. This study will compare the use of Prograf and Envarsus and their effects on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects, and patient adherence. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.
Detailed description
Tacrolimus (Prograf ©) has become part of the standard of care for patients receiving solid organ transplants and is part of the immunosuppressive protocol (along with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil \[CellCept ©\]) used by liver transplant recipients at University Health Network (UHN). Tacrolimus is associated with several toxicities including renal injury, tremor, pancreatic islet β-cell injury (leading to diabetes) and hyperlipidemia. As a result of these potential toxicities, careful therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is a key component of post-transplant management. Tacrolimus trough levels are known to correlate with total tacrolimus exposure, as shown from formal pharmacokinetic assessments. Accordingly, trough serum concentrations of tacrolimus are measured routinely in all recipients and are used to guide dosing. The Prograf formulation of tacrolimus has a short serum half-life and must be dosed twice daily to maintain therapeutic serum concentrations. Further, Prograf administration results in a high peak tacrolimus level. Peak tacrolimus levels have been shown to correlate with toxicity; thus, avoidance of high peaks may be desirable to minimize tacrolimus toxicity.
Envarsus is an extended-release formulation of tacrolimus that provides similar drug exposure to tacrolimus at a 30% lower dose but with a once daily dosing regimen. Envarsus dosing also results in a lower peak tacrolimus level compared to Prograf. In this way, it is hoped that Envarsus may provide similar therapeutic efficacy as Prograf but with fewer adverse effects. In addition, the simpler dosing regimen is expected to enhance patient adherence and quality of life.
The present study is aimed at evaluating the impact of a switch from Prograf to Envarsus on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects and adherence. It hypothesizes that once daily Envarsus can be substituted at reduced daily dose for twice daily Prograf in stable liver transplant recipients without clinically meaningful changes in liver allograft function while reducing tacrolimus side effects, reducing cumulative daily dose of the drug and increasing adherence to treatment and quality of life.The results of this study have the potential to change current practice. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.
Interventions
- Drug Prograf
Participants randomized to the Prograf (control) arm will continue with their current twice daily dosing of Prograf. - Drug Envarsus
Participants randomized to Envarsus arm will have their current daily dose of Prograf converted to once-daily Envarsus dose according to the following ratio: 0.7 x the current daily Prograf dose. Envarsus is available in 3 dose strengths- 0.75mg, 1.0mg, and 4.0mg. The actual dose of Envarsus will be rounded to an amount that can be administered using the above tablet strengths.
Primary outcome measures
- Change in AST levels [Time frame: Baseline to week 12]
- Change in ALT levels [Time frame: Baseline to week 12]
- Change in ALP levels [Time frame: Baseline to week 12]
- Change in Bilirubin blood levels [Time frame: Baseline to week 12]
- Change in tacrolimus trough levels [Time frame: Baseline to week 12]
- Change in overall daily dose of tacrolimus [Time frame: Baseline to week 12]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Change in Systolic Blood Pressure [Time frame: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
- Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure [Time frame: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
- Change in Renal function (eGFR) [Time frame: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
- Change in tremor severity (for subset of patients who report significant tremor at baseline) [Time frame: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
- Change in glycemic control (HbA1c) [Time frame: Baseline to week 24 and week 48]
- Change in lipid profile [Time frame: Baseline to week 24 and baseline to week 48]
- Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' Pain Interference Bank 2.0 [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
- Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Bank 1.0 [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
- Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Anxiety Bank 1.0 [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
- Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Depression Bank 1.0 [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
- Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Global Health Scale version 1.2 [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
- Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Fatigue bank 1.0 [Time frame: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adult (>18 years) prevalent liver transplant recipient
- >12 months after liver transplant
- Prograf-based maintenance immunosuppression with targeted tacrolimus trough level of 5-10 ug/L
- Stable liver allograft function (defined as ASL \& ALT <30, Bilirubin <20 \& ALP<150 at baseline visit or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
- Stable renal function (creatinine < 180 µmol/l and eGFR > 40 ml/min) at baseline visit (or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
- No episode of acute rejection within 6 months of baseline visit
- Elevated creatinine (defined as >ULN) OR Significant symptoms (by patient self-report) potentially associated with tacrolimus (eg. tremor, difficulty to concentrate, insomnia) OR difficulty to adhere to a twice daily regimen
Exclusion criteria
- Multiorgan transplant;
- severe intercurrent illness;
- severe cognitive impairment (all as determined by clinical team);
- unwilling to consent.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Canada · 1 center
- Toronto General Hospital — Toronto
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05655273 · 22-5210