Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07618520

Expanding Genetic Access for Prostate Cancer Survivors

No phase Interventional Prostate Cancer Patients Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Print Genetic Education Guide, Digital Guide Genetic Education Guide, Enhanced Usual Care.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Prostate Cancer Patients, Hereditary Cancer, Genetic Testing. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · Male.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Expanding Genetic Access and Guided Education for Prostate Cancer Survivors

Overview

The goal of this study is to increase genetic education and genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk among prostate cancer survivors. The study will: Test the effectiveness of a digital guide (DG+) vs. print guide (Print+) vs. enhanced usual care (EUC) on engagement in genetic education and uptake of genetic testing. Evaluate the impact of the DG+ vs. Print+ vs. EUC on the process that participants use to make decisions and evaluate effects on well-being (also called psychosocial outcomes). Explore the ways (methods) that influence how participants experience the intervention. The main questions this study aims to answer are: which group - the digital guide (DG+) group, print (Print+) group or the EUC group - is more likely to request genetic testing and which group is more likely to get (engage with) genetic education. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the digital guide (DG+) group, the print guide (Print+) group or EUC group. Each group will receive genetic education and have an opportunity to request genetic testing. Researchers will compare the three groups to determine which is most most likely to complete genetic testing (GT) and which group engages more with genetic education.

Detailed description

Research Design and Methods:

This study will employ a 3-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of the DG+ and Print+ interventions compared to EUC among 500 prostate cancer survivors who meet the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's guidelines for genetic referral. Primary outcomes will be engagement with genetic education and uptake of genetic testing (Aim 1). The investigators will also evaluate the impact of the interventions on psychosocial and decision quality outcomes (Aim 2) and evaluate mediators and moderators of intervention impact (Aim 3).

Research Procedures:

The design for this study is a 3-arm parallel group trial. Randomization is at the patient level. The investigators will recruit eligible cancer survivors who will be randomized by computer to enhanced usual care (EUC), DG+ or Print+ in a 1:2:2 ratio - with 100 participants randomized to EUC (control) arm and 200 randomized the each of the intervention arms (DG+ and Print+).

The investigators will utilize the EHRs at our participating sites to identify prostate cancer survivors who have not been tested despite meeting GT eligibility criteria. Participants will be ascertained from 1) Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center (LCCC) and MedStar Washington Cancer Institute (MWCI) in DC and 2) Rutgers' Cancer Institute (in New Brunswick and at University Hospital Newark) including RWJ Barnabas Health community oncology sites. Participants will be men who have a history of prostate cancer, are at least six-months post-diagnosis, and have received care at one of the participating sites in the prior five years. There is no limit on the years since diagnosis as genetic testing (GT) can guide treatment decisions and provide opportunities for cascade testing to guide screening and prevention in at-risk relatives.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Print Genetic Education Guide
    Consists of clinical letter, genetic testing kit, and a print genetic education guide along with streamlined access to genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk.
  • Behavioral Digital Guide Genetic Education Guide
    Consists of clinical letter, genetic testing kit, and access to a genetic education digital guide along with streamlined access to genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk.
  • Behavioral Enhanced Usual Care
    Consists of clinical letter and recommendation/referral to schedule a genetic counseling session.

Primary outcome measures

  • Uptake of Germline Genetic Testing [Time frame: 6-Months]
  • Survey Assessment of Impact of DG+ vs. Print+ vs. EUC [Time frame: 1-Month and 6-Month surveys]
  • Survey Assessment of Mediators and Moderators of Efficacy [Time frame: Baseline, 1-Month and 6-Month surveys]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Survey Assessment of Engagement with Genetic Education [Time frame: 1-Month Survey]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-80 years of age
  • At least 6-months post diagnosis with prostate cancer
  • Have not had genetic testing for hereditary cancer
  • Have received care at one of the participating sites in the prior five years
  • Meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for germline GT
  • Able to read and speak in English
  • Capable of providing informed consent
  • Have internet access (via smartphone, tablet or computer)
  • Comfortable using a computer or mobile phone independently to access information

Exclusion criteria

  • Do not speak English
  • Unable to access the Internet
  • Have previously undergone germline genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk or previously had genetic counseling (GC) and declined genetic testing (GT)
  • Are unable to provide informed consent

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Health services research

Study locations

United States · 2 centers
  • Georgetown University Medical Center/Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center — Washington D.C.
  • Rutgers University/Rutgers Cancer Institute — New Brunswick

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07618520 · 25-08-272 · R01CA296911

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗