A Comparative Study of Three Ureteral Stenting Strategies After Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Upper urinary tract calculi.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. Basic parameters: 18 years — 75 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
In recent years, with the widespread popularization of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept, tubeless ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) has gradually become a research hotspot. Multiple studies have indicated that tubeless management may be safe and feasible for strictly selected low-risk patients, and can prevent stent-related complications. Nevertheless, high-quality three-arm controlled trial evidence is still lacking regarding whether complete tubeless management is applicable to all patients with conventional urolithiasis, and whether an optimal time window exists to balance safety and comfort when ureteral stenting is mandatory. Most existing studies only compare stenting versus non-stenting, or long-term versus short-term stenting, without systematic comparison of tubeless management, short-term stenting (1-week indwelling) and conventional stenting (2-week indwelling) within a unified framework. In summary, although URL techniques have matured, numerous uncertainties remain in postoperative ureteral stent management strategies. Rigorously designed prospective studies are urgently needed in clinical practice to comprehensively evaluate differences in complication control, patient quality of life (assessed by the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire \[USSQ\]), unplanned readmission rates and health-economic costs among three management modalities: tubeless approach, stent removal at postoperative 1 week and stent removal at postoperative 2 weeks. This study aims to fill this evidence gap, provide high-level evidence-based medical references for urologists to develop individualized and precise postoperative ureteral stent management protocols, and ultimately achieve dual optimization of patients' recovery speed and quality of life.
Interventions
- Procedure Upper urinary tract calculi
Group A (Tubeless Group): No Double-J stent is placed after confirming no severe injury or significant residual calculi upon surgery completion. Postoperative routine anti-inflammatory treatment and fluid infusion are administered. Group B (1-Week Stent Group): A 4.7Fr or 6Fr Double-J stent is indwelled postoperatively. Stent removal is performed via outpatient cystoscopy at postoperative day 7 (±1 day). Group C (2-Week Stent Group): The same type of Double-J stent is indwelled postoperatively
Primary outcome measures
- Incidence of postoperative complications [Time frame: 1 month]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Aged ≥18 years; diagnosed with unilateral upper urinary tract calculi (ureteral calculi or renal pelvic/calyceal calculi, diameter ≤2 cm) by computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography.
Scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL), including rigid or flexible ureteroscopy.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients undergoing bilateral surgery. Pregnant or lactating women. Patients with pre-existing ureteral stents at the time of ureteroscopy. Patients with anatomical abnormalities (e.g., horseshoe kidney, pelvic kidney, solitary kidney) or renal transplant recipients.
Patients with systemic infectious manifestations. Patients unable to provide informed consent. Patients with uncontrolled coagulopathy, severe preoperative hydronephrosis or pyonephrosis.
Patients with incomplete clearance of stone fragments during primary ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL).
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT07616505 · 2026-0280