Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07541118

Evaluating an Implementation Strategy to Improve Physical Activity and Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Children

No phase Interventional Physical Activity

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: MAGIC, Control.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Physical Activity. Basic parameters: from 5 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Overview

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of enhanced Movement for Academic Growth In Classrooms (MAGIC) for improving implementation and effectiveness of physically active breaks, lessons, and motor labs

Interventions

  • Behavioral MAGIC
    The experimental arm includes using a multifaceted implementation strategy to support the use of classroom-based physical activity approaches (e.g., physically active breaks, physically active lessons, and motor labs). The strategy consists of a series of leadership trainings designed to help them support teachers, teacher trainings to build skills, and a monthly newsletter to reinforce implementation and provide access to existing resources.
  • Behavioral Control
    Participants may receive usual support from the district with access to guidance from district leaders

Primary outcome measures

  • Implementation fidelity as assessed by teacher self-reported implementation logs to assess dose of delivery [Time frame: Baseline]
  • Implementation fidelity as assessed by teacher self-reported implementation logs to assess dose of delivery [Time frame: about 6 months after baseline]
  • Implementation fidelity as assessed by teacher self-reported implementation logs to assess dose of delivery [Time frame: about 12 months after baseline]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Student Physical Activity as Indicated by Number of Minutes Per Day Spent in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity as Assessed by the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer [Time frame: baseline]
  • Student Physical Activity as Indicated by Number of Minutes Per Day Spent in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity as Assessed by the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer [Time frame: about 6 months after baseline]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • students enrolled at participating elementary schools at the partner district
  • teachers employed at participating elementary schools at the partner district

Exclusion criteria

  • non English or Spanish speaking

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston — Houston

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07541118 · HSC-SPH-25-0498

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗