Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07456072

Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Impregnated Gauze Versus Povidone Iodine Dressing in Post Trauma Wound Care

No phase Interventional Wound Infection Post-Traumatic Wound Healing

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze, Povidone iodine dressing.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Wound Infection Post-Traumatic, Wound Healing. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Overview

To compare rate of infection and wound healing between chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze and dry povidone-iodine dressings in post-traumatic wounds.

Interventions

  • Procedure Chlorhexidine impregnated paraffin gauze
    Paraffin gauze impregnated with 0.2 % chlorhexidine
  • Procedure Povidone iodine dressing
    Standard povidone iodine dressing

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in infection rate [Time frame: 3 months]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Change in Wound healing [Time frame: 3 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18-65 years of age with acute post-trauma wounds.
  • Wounds that are clean contaminated at presentation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with the known allergies to Chlorhexidine or Povidone-Iodine.
  • Chronic wounds or those with underlying chronic conditions, such as diabetes.
  • Patients with compromised immune systems.
  • Pregnant females

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07456072 · No.F.1-1/2015/ERB/SZABMU/1482

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗