Menu
Recruiting NCT07338526

Intensity Modulated PrOton Therapy in Pediatric BRain Tumors (IMPORT)

No phase Interventional Brain Tumor, Pediatric

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), Photon-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)..
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Brain Tumor, Pediatric. Basic parameters: 6 years — 16 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
India
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Intensity Modulated PrOton Therapy in Pediatric BRain Tumors (IMPORT): A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Children diagnosed with benign or low-grade brain tumors often require radiation therapy to control their disease. While radiation can be effective, traditional techniques using X-rays (photon-based radiotherapy) expose healthy brain tissue to radiation, potentially leading to long-term side effects like memory loss, learning difficulties, hormone imbalances, hearing problems, and a higher risk of secondary cancers. This study, called the IMPORT Trial, aims to compare two types of radiation therapy-Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)-to determine which is safer and more effective for children. IMPT, a newer technique, uses protons instead of X-rays to deliver radiation, reducing exposure to healthy brain tissue. Researchers believe this could help minimize long-term damage while maintaining effective tumor control. What is the goal of the study? The primary goal is to see if IMPT leads to better survival with fewer side effects compared to IMRT. The study will track how well children function over five years, looking at: * Cognitive abilities (memory, attention, learning) * Hormonal balance (pituitary gland function) * Hearing ability * Overall survival without significant decline in quality of life How will the study work? * Who can join? Children aged 6 to 16 years diagnosed with certain types of benign or low-grade brain tumors. * How are patients treated? Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either IMRT or IMPT. * What is analysed? Doctors will track survival, tumor control, cognitive function, endocrine health, and quality of life over time. * How long will it take? The study will last 10 years (5 years to enroll patients, 5 years to follow up). Proton therapy is more expensive and not widely available, so strong scientific evidence is needed to justify its use in routine treatment. If IMPT significantly improves quality of life and survival, it could become the preferred treatment, shaping future policies and making proton therapy more accessible for children who need it.

Detailed description

Benign and low-grade primary brain tumors constitute a substantial proportion of pediatric central nervous system tumors and are associated with excellent long-term survival when managed with multimodality therapy. Despite favorable tumor control rates, survivors are at significant risk of treatment-related late effects, particularly following radiation therapy, which can adversely impact neurocognitive function, endocrine health, auditory function, and overall quality of life. Given the prolonged life expectancy of this population, minimizing radiation-induced toxicity while maintaining effective disease control is a major therapeutic priority.

Radiation therapy remains an essential curative modality for children with unresectable, residual, progressive, or recurrent benign and low-grade brain tumors. Advances in high-precision photon-based techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have improved dose conformality; however, photon therapy continues to expose large volumes of normal brain tissue to low and intermediate radiation doses. This exposure may lead to white matter injury, neuroinflammation, microvascular damage, and subsequent neurocognitive, endocrine, and auditory dysfunction, particularly in younger patients with developing brains.

Proton beam therapy offers a potential dosimetric advantage over photon therapy due to its physical depth-dose characteristics, allowing reduced integral dose to surrounding normal tissues. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), delivered using pencil beam scanning, enables highly conformal dose distributions with improved sparing of organs at risk and may allow for reduction in treatment margins through enhanced image guidance and dose painting capabilities. These properties suggest a potential for meaningful reduction in late radiation-related toxicity in pediatric patients, while preserving tumor control.

While dosimetric and retrospective clinical data suggest advantages of proton therapy in reducing radiation exposure to critical neural structures, robust prospective randomized evidence demonstrating clinically meaningful benefits remains limited. Furthermore, the higher cost and limited availability of proton therapy necessitate careful evaluation of its value relative to advanced photon techniques, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare systems. Generating high-level evidence to guide patient selection and policy decisions is therefore essential.

The IMPORT trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase III superiority study designed to compare IMPT with IMRT in children with benign and low-grade primary brain tumors treated with curative intent radiotherapy. The trial focuses on outcomes that are particularly relevant to long-term pediatric survivorship, including neurocognitive function, endocrine and auditory toxicity, and quality of life, while ensuring comparable tumor control.

The study introduces the concept of Qualified Overall Survival (qOS) as a composite primary endpoint that integrates survival, disease control, and clinically significant treatment-related morbidity. This composite endpoint is intended to capture outcomes that reflect both oncologic efficacy and functional preservation, thereby providing a patient-centered assessment of treatment benefit.

Participants will be randomized to receive either IMPT or IMRT, with radiation dose, fractionation, and target volumes determined by tumor type, location, and standard clinical practice. Tumor response and disease progression will be assessed using contemporary imaging-based criteria, while functional outcomes will be evaluated using standardized neurocognitive testing, endocrine assessments, audiological evaluations, and patient-reported quality-of-life instruments.

By directly comparing IMPT and IMRT in a randomized setting, the IMPORT trial aims to determine whether the dosimetric advantages of proton therapy translate into superior long-term functional outcomes and improved qualified survival, thereby informing evidence-based clinical decision-making and health policy for pediatric brain tumor management.

Interventions

  • Radiation Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT)
    Patients in the experimental arm will receive focal cranial radiotherapy using proton therapy delivered with IMPT or proton arc techniques. Dose prescriptions and volumes will match institutional standards independent of study allocation. Planning will include CT and MRI fusion, with target and OAR delineation identical to the control arm. Proton plans will use robust optimization and undergo multidisciplinary review. Treatment will be delivered with image guidance, with weekly toxicity monitori
  • Radiation Photon-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
    Patients in the control arm will receive focal cranial radiotherapy using photon-based IG-IMRT delivered with VMAT. Dose, fractionation, and target volumes will follow standard institutional protocols based on tumor type and molecular features. Planning CT and MRI fusion will guide contouring of GTV, CTV, PTV, and organs at risk. Treatment plans will be generated in the Treatment Planning System and reviewed in multidisciplinary meetings. Radiotherapy will be delivered on IGRT-equipped linear ac

Primary outcome measures

  • Survival Outcome [Time frame: 5 years]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Overall Survival (OS) [Time frame: At 5 years]
  • Progression-free Survival (PFS) [Time frame: at 5 years]
  • Quality of Life indices [Time frame: Pre-Radiotherapy (Baseline), Radiotherapy conclusion- within 1 week, 3-months post RT, 1-year post RT, annually till 5-years]
  • Cost-effectiveness based on EQ-5D-5L derived utilities [Time frame: Pre-Radiotherapy (Baseline), Radiotherapy conclusion- within 1 week, 3-months post RT, 1-year post RT, annually till 5-years]
  • Response Rate (RR) [Time frame: Radiotherapy conclusion- within 1 week, 3-months post RT, 1-year post RT, annually till 5-years]
  • Sub-domain of qOS [Time frame: Radiotherapy conclusion- within 1 week, 3-months post RT, 1-year post RT, annually till 5-years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age at irradiation: 6 to 16 years
  • Karnofsky/ Lansky Play Performance Status ≥ 60
  • Diagnosis (histopathological/ radiological) of primary brain tumor with an expected survival of >5 years (e.g., circumscribed gliomas, low grade gliomas, low-grade glial/ glioneuronal tumors, meningioma, pituitary tumors, schwannoma, craniopharyngioma, ependymoma)
  • Planned for focal cranial radiotherapy
  • Informed consent taken

Exclusion criteria

  • Re-irradiation
  • Palliative radiotherapy
  • Multifocal or multicentric disease
  • Planned for whole brain irradiation or craniospinal irradiation
  • Planned for hypo-fractionated or stereotactic radiotherapy

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

India · 1 center
  • Tata Memorial Hospital — Mumbai

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07338526 · 4785

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗