Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07273942

Remote Ischemic Postconditioning in Septic Shock

No phase Interventional Adult Patients With Septic Shock Admitted in Intensive Care Unit

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Remote ischemic conditioning, No intervention.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Adult Patients With Septic Shock Admitted in Intensive Care Unit. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Septic shock is a leading cause of death worldwide despite intensive research efforts. Only a few interventions have been proven to be effective in improving patient-centered outcomes. Recent clinical trials have reported the safety and efficacy of remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPOST) in a variety of pathologies, including myocardial infarction, cardiac surgery, and stroke. While RIPOST was mainly tested in pathologies with low mortality rates, several follow-up studies of large randomized clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction and in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery have reported significant decreases (\> 50%) in long-term mortality. Experimental studies and proof-of-concept clinical trials have also suggested the potential benefits of RIPOST on mortality in sepsis and septic shock. The present protocol aims to test whether this non-invasive, widely available, inexpensive, and innovative intervention can improve survival in septic shock.

Interventions

  • Other Remote ischemic conditioning
    A brachial cuff is positioned around one arm of the patient. Remote ischemic conditioning consists of alternating inflations and deflations of the brachial cuff. Four cycles of ischemic conditioning (5-min brachial cuff inflation at 200 mmHg followed by 5-min cuff deflation) are started as soon as possible after inclusion. The intervention is repeated 12 and 24 hours after inclusion.
  • Other No intervention
    No intervention will be performed in the conrol group

Primary outcome measures

  • All-cause mortality at day 90 after inclusion [Time frame: 90 days after inclusion]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Functional recovery [Time frame: Day 90]
  • SF-36 (Short Form-36 Health Survey) questionnaire score [Time frame: Day 90]
  • Number of days alive without vasopressors [Time frame: Day 7]
  • Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [Time frame: Inclusion and days 1, 3 and 7]
  • Sepsis-induced immuno-inflammatory responses [Time frame: Inclusion and days 1, 3 and 7]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Hospitalized in intensive care unit for less than 24 hours
  • Septic shock (Sepsis-3 definition) evolving for less than 18 hours
  • Preliminary written informed consent obtained from the patient or his/her close relative, or use of the emergency procedure in accordance with local regulations

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication of the use of a brachial pressure cuff on both arms
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Participation in another interventional study
  • Lack of French national health insurance coverage
  • Patient with any legal protection measure

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 23 centers
  • Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Jean-Minjoz, CHU de Besançon — Besançon
  • Service Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Fleyriat — Bourg-en-Bresse
  • Service de Médecine Intensive- Réanimation, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont-Ferr — Clermont-Ferrand
  • Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique des H — Créteil
  • Service de Médecine intensive-Réanimation,Hôpital F Mitterrand, CHU de Dijon — Dijon
  • Service de Médecine intensive-Réanimation,Hôpital Albert Michallon, CHU de Grenoble — La Tronche
  • Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique des Hôpita — Le Kremlin-Bicêtre
  • Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital Salengro, CHU de Lille — Lille
  • … and 15 more centers

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07273942 · 69HCL24_0937

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗