Designing Visual Tools to Enhance Cancer Surgeon Decision-making
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Visual, No intervention.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Prostate Cancer, Kidney Cancer. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
This prospective study will compare pre-post pilot test of surgeon-facing, visual decision support among urologists seeing patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate and kidney cancer. Up to 20 urologists (10 academic and 10 community) will be enrolled. The goal will be to capture up to 10 pre- and 10 post-intervention patient encounters for each urologist with an accrual target of 200 unique patient visits (100 pre and 100 post-intervention) over a half-year period. Patient encounters pre- and post-intervention will be audio recorded, transcribed, and coded for discussion of risks/benefits of surgery and strength of recommendation. Patients and urologists will complete additional surveys on their perceptions of patient-provider communication. Urologists will further describe their experience and rate their satisfaction with visual decision support. Communication (content and perceived) will be compared pre- and post-intervention with secondary comparisons by race and care setting. It was hypothesized that the discussion of risks and benefits of cancer surgery will increase post-intervention and that the strength of recommendation and perceptions of patient-provider communication will change. The secondary hypothesis is that these changes will differ by patient race and care setting.
Interventions
- Behavioral Visual
Physician participants will view the visual decision support before entering the patient's room during the intervention period, with the option to share with the patient. - Other No intervention
No intervention
Primary outcome measures
- Discussion of Risks and Benefits [Time frame: Baseline (Patient-Physician Encounter)]
Secondary outcome measures (10)
- The impact of the visual decision support on the strength of the recommendations - observer [Time frame: Baseline (Patient-Physician Encounter)]
- The impact of the visual decision support on the strength of the recommendations - surgeon rated [Time frame: Baseline (After-Visit)]
- Patient-Centered Communication [Time frame: Baseline (After-Visit)]
- Physician Satisfaction Scale [Time frame: Baseline (After-Visit)]
- Patient-Physician Communication [Time frame: Baseline (After-Visit)]
- Patient Decision-Making [Time frame: Up to 6 months]
- Physician Decision-Making [Time frame: Baseline (After-Visit)]
- Treatment Selection/Quality [Time frame: Up to12 months]
- Perceived Usability Ratings [Time frame: Up to 6 months]
- Physician Debriefing Interview [Time frame: Up to 6 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
In order to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the eligibility criteria outlined below.
- Verbal informed consent was obtained to participate in the study.
- Subject is willing and able to comply with study procedures based on the judgment of the investigator or protocol designee.
- Age ≥ 18 years at the time of consent.
- For patient subjects, HIPAA authorization for the release of personal health information and a new histologic diagnosis of localized prostate cancer based on prostate biopsy or clinical diagnosis of T1 renal mass (≤7 cm in diameter) Suspicion for kidney cancer based on cross-sectional imaging. New diagnosis is defined as within 6 months of consent. T1 renal masses include solid masses or Bosniak III/IV cystic masses.
- For physician subjects, practicing urologist in North Carolina at UNC Health, Novant Health, or an affiliated site and sees patients with suspected or confirmed prostate or kidney cancer.
Exclusion criteria
The subjects meeting the following criteria will be excluded from study participation:
- Non-English speaking.
- Unwilling or unable to complete informed consent.
- For patient subjects:
- Has staging information indicating locally advanced or metastatic disease. This would include PSA >50 ng/ml, imaging suggestive of distant metastasis, or lymph node involvement, renal masses >7 cm or invading in renal sinus or tumor thrombus.
- Histologic or clinical diagnosis >6 months before date of consent.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomized
- Model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
Study locations
United States · 2 centers
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center — Chapel Hill
- New Hanover Regional Medical Center — Wilmington
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06965192 · LCC2321Aim3