Hypercaloric PEG Nutrition in ALS to Sustain Energy Homeostasis

Overview

Weight loss is a known negative prognostic factor in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Over the last years, various interventional studies targeting the energy deficit in ALS yielded promising results; however,it is still unclear which kind of nutrition or nutritional supplement is most beneficial. Moreover, there is lack of evidence regarding interventions in patients with a PEG in later disease stages.In a pilot study conducted in 2013, it was demonstrated that body weight can be stabilized in ALS by applying either a fat-rich or carbohydrate-rich high-caloric food supplement. In 2014, Wills et al. conducted a placebo-controlled randomized controlled pilot study, which indicated that a carbohydrate-rich, hypercaloric diet, consisting in 125% of estimated energy requirements as determined by indirect calorimetry, in patients fed via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was safe and well tolerated. Moreover, these patients showed longer survival than patients fed with a fat-rich, hypercaloric diet or an isocaloric diet . Hypercaloric, high-carbohydrate diet also showed beneficial effects on body weight and Body Mass Index . Although these results were promising, the low number of patients (n=24) was a severe limiting factor of this study. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a hypercaloric PEG nutrition, consisting of 120% of estimated calorie requierements, compared to an isocaloric nutrition. Individual energy requirement is determined by performing indirect calorimetry and activity questionnaire. The investigators hypothsize, that a hypercaloric PEG nutrition slows down disease progression as measured by neurofilament light chains (NfL) in serum after 6 months compared to placebo. Power calculation relies on the results of the lipids and calories for ALS (LIPCAL-ALS) study which tested the effect of an oral high-caloric fatty nutritional supplement in ALS. The study revealed that NfL serum values declined significantly in the intervention group while remaining stable in the placebo group over the course of the study. Assuming a similar effect size, we calculated that 76 patients had to be included in the current trial.

Detailed description

Patients eligible for study participation will be randomized to one of two groups (hypercaloric or isocaloric diet) at baseline visit. Intervention or control diet will be administered as an add-on to standard therapy. Calory requirement will be individually determined by indirect calorimetry which measures resting energy expenditure (REE) and by collecting physical activity data. Indirect calorimetry is a non-invasive procedure which allows to calculate resting energy expenditure by measuring carbon dioxide and oxygen in the expired air using a canopy hood or a full-face mask. For both groups, a standard PEG nutrition featuring a balanced ratio of fat, carbohydrates, and protein according to human requirements will be used (e.g. Fresenius Fresubin® Energy Fibre/2250 Complete).

PEG nutrition used in this study (e.g. Fresenius Fresubin® Energy Fibre/2250 Complete) is routinely used in clinical practice for feeding of patients with ALS and PEG. It is known to be well tolerable and safe. In few cases of intolerance, this standard tube feeding may be switched to another product (e. g. HiPP Sondennahrung), but the amount of calories will not be changed.

In clinical routine, energy needs are usually estimated using the Harris-Benedict-formula, based on body weight, height, sex and age. However, this formula only provides approximate values. Therefore, in this study, indirect calorimetry is used to obtain precise values of energy needs. The German version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Last 7 Days Self-administered Format (IPAQ) is used for determining the physical activity level. The total energy requirement is calculated by adding the resting energy expenditure and the activity-related calorie requirement.

In the control group, 100% of the estimated calorie requirement is administered with the goal of covering energy needs and stabilizing body weight. The hypercaloric diet in the intervention group consists in 120% of the calorie requirement determined by indirect calorimetry. Resting energy expenditure in ALS patients is 14% higher than in a healthy control cohort. We assume that activity-related energy expenditure is increased similarly. Therefore, the hypercaloric diet consisting in 120% of calorie requirement aims to cover these additional energy needs. Similarly, a recent study in patients with PEG used 125% of calorie requirement.

Interventions

• Dietary supplement 100% of individual calory requirement
  Patients receive any PEG nutrition containing the calory requirement as determined by indirect calorimetry, physical activity score and the randomized group.
• Dietary supplement 120% of individual calory requirement
  Patients receive any PEG nutrition containing the calory requirement as determined by indirect calorimetry, physical activity score and the randomized group.

Primary outcome measures

• Neurofilament light chain (NfL) in serum [Time frame: 6 months]

Secondary outcome measures (12)

• Survival [Time frame: 6 months]
• ALS functional rating scale revised (ALSFRS-R) [Time frame: 6 months]
• Body mass index (BMI) [Time frame: 6 months]
• Slow vital capacity [Time frame: 6 months]
• Resting energy expenditure (REE) [Time frame: 6 months]
• Individual Quality of Life [Time frame: 6 months]
• Appetite [Time frame: 6 months]
• Eating habits [Time frame: 6 months]
• Adverse Events [Time frame: 6 months]
• Fatt mass [Time frame: 6 months]
• Total Body Water [Time frame: 6 months]
• Muscle Mass [Time frame: 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Possible, probable (clinically or laboratory) or definite ALS according to the revised version of the El Escorial World Federation of Neurology criteria 1
• Loss of ALS functional rating scale revised (ALSFRS-R) of ≥ 0.33 points per month since onset (first paresis) based on the formula: (48 - Score at Screening Visit) / (Months between Onset and Screening Visit)
• Nutrition via PEG
• Age ≥18 years
• Intake of a stable dose of riluzole for at least 4 weeks, or no riluzole
• Capable of thoroughly understanding all information given and giving full informed consent according to GCP

Exclusion criteria

• Previous participation in another interventional study within the preceding 4 weeks
• Absence of adequate social support and cooperation, or personal motivation (in the judgment of the investigator) to complete the study satisfactorily
• Pregnancy or breast-feeding females
• Evidence of a major psychiatric disorder or clinically evident dementia

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation

Randomized

Model

Parallel assignment

Masking

Quadruple blind

Primary purpose

Treatment

Study locations

Germany · 1 center

• Ulm Universita, Department of Neurology — Ulm

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06877143 · 387/23 · PEGASUS V 1.0

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗