Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06839573

Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality in Nursing Students' Learning

No phase Interventional Informed Consent

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Experience with virtual reality glasses.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Informed Consent. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve Learning Outcomes in Nursing Degree Students: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

Teaching using VR for basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient examination (experimental group) will not result in differences in knowledge and skill acquisition compared to traditional classroom-based simulation teaching (control group), but it will lead to greater satisfaction and self-confidence. Open, single-center randomized clinical trial involving fourth-year nursing degree students at a public university. Participants will be assigned based on their usual teaching groups (ratio of 6-8 students per instructor) and, according to randomization, will receive a 1:1 assignment to either the control group (classroom-based simulation teaching) or the experimental group (classroom-based simulation teaching combined with VR headset teaching). The CONSORT checklist will be followed to report the study.

Interventions

  • Other Experience with virtual reality glasses
    If the group belongs to GE (teaching with in-person simulation in the classroom and teaching with VR headsets), they will also receive the two training sessions described for GC: 30 minutes of individual training through VR (headsets and controllers to perform actions while receiving immediate feedback through VR) before the in-person simulation.

Primary outcome measures

  • Compare the satisfaction [Time frame: Five months]
  • Compare the self-confidence [Time frame: Five months]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • To compare the acquisition of knowledge in each teaching group. [Time frame: Five months]
  • To compare the acquisition of skills in each teaching group. [Time frame: Five months]
  • To evaluate students' tolerance to VR headset technology. [Time frame: Five months]
  • To assess the usability of VR headsets by students. [Time frame: Five months]
  • To analyze the costs of traditional teaching with in-person simulation compared to teaching with VR. [Time frame: Five months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

\- having completed the scheduled in-person simulation in previous years of the degree .

Exclusion criteria

-the student does not sign the informed consent to participate in the study.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06839573 · UB-UJI-RV25

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗