Menu
Recruiting NCT06332040

Gentamicin Bladder Instillation on CAUTI

Phase IV Interventional Catheter Infection

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Gentamicin.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Catheter Infection. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Gentamicin Bladder Instillation on CAUTI

Overview

Urinary tract infections in catheterized patients is an unacceptable complication and has been termed a 'never event' by the Center for Medicare \& Medicaid Services (CMS); however there is not consensus among clinicians on how to best prevent CAUTIs. We propose a prospective randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of prophylactic gentamicin bladder irrigation in elimination of CAUTIs.

Detailed description

Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) is a hospital acquired infection considered preventable by the Center for Medicare \& Medicaid Services (CMS) and originally estimated to cost each individual patient approximately $4700 per infection in 2009 US dollars1. In the inpatient population, more contemporary calculations have associated the per patient cost to have risen to a mean of $13,793 per patient (range $4,694-$29,743)2, with an increased median length of stay of 3.6 days, and a 1.37 increased odds ratio of death3.

CMS understandably has declared CAUTI a "never event", a term coined by the National Quality Forum and used to describe preventable hospital acquired infections4. Since 2008 they have tied this quality metric to severe hospital payment penalties to incentivize prioritization of strategies to decrease CAUTIs.

Despite considerable efforts to remain in compliance with this guidance, and hospitals nationwide implementing safer catheter placement training as well as aggressive early catheter removal protocols, it has become clear that CAUTIs are almost never a never event5. Quantitative analyses of these events have estimated that only 65-70% of CAUTIs are truly preventable with current evidence-based prevention strategies6.

In our intensive care units the pragmatic reasons explaining this phenomenon are abundantly clear. Trauma patients critically injured with multiple spinal, pelvic and long bone fractures, intubated on a ventilator and immobile have substantially higher rates of urine retention when foley catheters are removed aggressively within 72 hours of admission per current infection control protocols. Similarly, neuro critical care patients who incurred a massive stroke or traumatic brain injury who are immobilized from their disabilities do not routinely succeed with early catheter removal protocols. Replacing indwelling foley catheters after multiple failed intermittent urinary catheterizations incurs increased urethral trauma and pain for the patient, increased risk of procedural complications, and increased risk of CAUTI due to repeated urethral instrumentation.

On the basis of and in response to a clear need to develop novel strategies to eliminate CAUTIs in those patients for whom early catheter removal is not deemed clinically appropriate, we collected 8 months of pilot data at our level I trauma center ICU in which we prophylactically instilled an antibiotic containing irrigation solution into the indwelling foley catheters in patients who required catheterization for greater than 3 days. Over the observed pilot period zero CAUTI events were recorded as compared to a comparison control group of trauma patients with identical inclusion criteria for whom 9 "never event" CAUTIs were incurred. These differences were statistically significant.

The current proposal aims to expand this pilot data and conduct a full randomized trial to validate the efficacy of gentamicin antibiotic irrigation in critically ill patients with an indwelling foley catheter of greater than 3 days duration. We plan to expand our patient population to include critically ill patients admitted to the trauma, neuro-critical care and medical ICU units.

The current proposal aims to expand this pilot data and conduct a randomized trial to validate the efficacy of gentamicin antibiotic irrigation in critically ill patients with an indwelling foley catheter of greater than 3 days duration. We plan to expand our patient population to include critically ill patients admitted to the trauma, neuro-critical care and medical ICU units. Our primary research question is: Is prophylactic gentamicin bladder irrigation associated with decreased CAUTI in a cohort of catheterized trauma and neuro critical care patients.

Interventions

  • Drug Gentamicin
    random assignment to gentamicin or placebo bladder instillation to prevent CAUTI (catheterized urinary track infection)

Primary outcome measures

  • CAUTI as primary outcome [Time frame: 30 days]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • age greater than 18
  • admitted with a trauma, surgical, or neuro-critical care diagnosis
  • indwelling foley catheter in place

Exclusion criteria

  • Documented positive UA or Urine Culture within the past 7 days or upon admission
  • Traumatic bladder injury
  • Gross hematuria
  • Chronic indwelling urethral or chronic suprapubic foley catheter
  • allergy to gentamicin or similar aminoglycosides

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • St. Jpseph's Hospital and Medical Center — Phoenix

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06332040 · 22-500-243-50-35

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗