Evaluating Artisential Laparoscopic Instruments in Gynecologic Surgery
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Articulating laparoscopic instrument, Conventional laparoscopic instrument, Robotic surgical instrument.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Mesh Augmentation, Laparoscopic Surgery. Basic parameters: from 22 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Utilizing the Artisential Articulating Laparoscopic Instruments
Overview
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Artisential laparoscopic instruments in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
Detailed description
The Artisential laparoscopic instrument is a novel device that allows multi-directional articulation during laparoscopic surgery. There are currently no studies evaluating the efficacy or safety of this device in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The investigators aim to compare the efficacy and safety of the Artisential instrument with conventional laparoscopic or robotic instruments.
Patients who are scheduled for a laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy and/or laparoscopic or robotic sacrocolpopexy will be invited to participate in this study. During the suturing portion of the surgery (either vaginal cuff closure during a hysterectomy, or mesh attachment during a sacrocolpopexy), operating times and safety outcomes will be measured. The approach for vaginal cuff closure will be randomly selected. The approach for mesh attachment suturing will be based on the primary surgical approach (conventional laparoscopy or robotic) and compared to suturing with the Artisential and an internally controlled environment. Therefore, half of the knots placed during a case will be with the Artisential laparoscopic device, and the other half will be placed either with robotic instruments or conventional laparoscopic instruments.
Interventions
- Device Articulating laparoscopic instrument
The Artisential articulating laparoscopic instrument will be evaluated for efficacy and safety in suturing during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. - Device Conventional laparoscopic instrument
Conventional laparoscopic instruments will be evaluated for efficacy and safety in suturing during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. - Device Robotic surgical instrument
Robotic surgical instruments will be evaluated for efficacy and safety in suturing during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
Primary outcome measures
- Mesh suturing time [Time frame: Intraoperative]
- Vaginal cuff suturing time [Time frame: Intraoperative]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- Needling times [Time frame: Intraoperative]
- Knot tying times [Time frame: Intraoperative]
- Knot location [Time frame: Intraoperative]
- Surgical complications [Time frame: Intraoperative]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patient scheduled for robotic or laparoscopic total hysterectomy
- Patient scheduled for robotic or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Exclusion criteria
- Not a candidate for the above surgical procedures
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Publications
- Darwich I, Abuassi M, Weiss C, Stephan D, Willeke F. The Artisential(R) Articulated Laparoscopic Forceps: A Dry Lab Study to Examine Dexterity and Learning Effects in Operators with Different Levels of Laparoscopic Experience. Surg Technol Int. 2021 May 20;38:29-36. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.38.SO1424. PMID 33755941
- Jung Y, Hong JI, Han KN, Kim HK. Thoracoscopic anterior mediastinal mass removal using an articulating laparoscopic instrument. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Aug 18;33(3):498. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab110. No abstract available. PMID 33880541
- Kim A, Lee CM, Park S. Is it Beneficial to Utilize an Articulating Instrument in Single-Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy? J Gastric Cancer. 2021 Mar;21(1):38-48. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e2. Epub 2021 Mar 11. PMID 33854812
- Darwich I, Scheidt M, Koliesnikov Y, Willeke F. Laparoscopic low anterior resection performed using ArtiSential(R) in an obese male patient with a narrow pelvis - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;23(3):757-758. doi: 10.1111/codi.15473. Epub 2020 Dec 18. No abstract available. PMID 33275820
- Trevis J, Chilvers N, Freystaetter K, Dunning J. Surgeon-Powered Robotics in Thoracic Surgery; An Era of Surgical Innovation and Its Benefits for the Patient and Beyond. Front Surg. 2020 Nov 26;7:589565. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.589565. eCollection 2020. PMID 33330607
- Kang SH, Won Y, Lee K, Youn SI, Min SH, Park YS, Ahn SH, Kim HH. Single-Incision Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Flap Esophagogastrostomy Using Novel Laparoscopic Instruments. Surg Innov. 2021 Feb;28(1):151-154. doi: 10.1177/1553350620958237. Epub 2020 Sep 16. PMID 32938322
- Jin HY, Lee CS, Lee YS. Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with D3 lymph node dissection using a new articulating instrument. Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Feb;25(2):235-237. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02345-z. Epub 2020 Sep 14. No abstract available. PMID 32926244
- Min SH, Cho YS, Park K, Lee Y, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Multi-DOF (Degree of Freedom) Articulating Laparoscopic Instrument is an Effective Device in Performing Challenging Sutures. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Dec 15;22(4):157-163. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.4.157. PMID 35601367
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06050161 · KM23033