Menu
Recruiting NCT05762198

Comparing Water Vapour Thermal Therapy (Rezūm) and TURP

No phase Interventional Prostate Cancer

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Rezūm, TURP.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Prostate Cancer. Basic parameters: 50 years — 80 years · Male.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Hong Kong
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Water Vapour Thermal Therapy (Rezūm) and TURP in Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Refractory Urinary Retention

Overview

This is a randomized controlled trial using a non-inferiority design with the subjects randomized 1:1 to either water vapour thermal treatment (REZUM) arm or transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) arm.

Interventions

  • Device Rezūm
    In the REZUM arm, water vapour treatment is performed for all subjects under local anaesthesia.
  • Device TURP
    In the TURP arm, all men will receive TURP operation under general or spinal anaesthesia

Primary outcome measures

  • Changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months after treatment [Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
  • Successful trial without catheter (TWOC) within 3 months [Time frame: At 3 months]
  • Complication rate [Time frame: 30 days after intervention]
  • Post-op quality of life score [Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention]
  • Change in voiding function in uroflowmetry [Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention]
  • Post-op International Index of Erectile function score [Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention]
  • Hospital stays of procedure [Time frame: On Discharge]
  • Unplanned readmission rate after operation in 30 days [Time frame: 30 days after intervention]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Men 50-80 years
  • Refractory urinary retention related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
  • On urethral Foley's catheter before treatment
  • Prostate size 30-80ml on ultrasound

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior prostate operation
  • Past or current history of prostate cancer
  • Strong suspicion of prostate cancer (e.g. Elevated PSA before urinary retention or abnormal prostate on DRE without workup for prostate cancer)
  • Known Urethral stricture / Bladder stone / Hypocontractile bladder
  • Known neurological diseases which may affect bladder function (e.g. Parkinsonism, stroke)
  • Contraindicated to undergo TURP or REZUM (e.g. not fit for GA/SA, active urinary tract infection, fail to be placed in lithotomy position, uncorrectable coagulopathy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant which cannot be stopped)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Hong Kong · 1 center
  • Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong — Hong Kong

Publications

  • Ng CF, Yee CH, Chan CK, Wong HM, Chiu PK, Tsu JH, Teoh JY, Ho KL. Bipolar transurethral vapourisation versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Jun;23 Suppl 2(3):32-34. No abstract available. PMID 29938669
  • Yee CH, Wong JH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Chan CK, Chan ES, Hou SM, Ng CF. Secondary hemorrhage after bipolar transurethral resection and vaporization of prostate. Urol Ann. 2016 Oct-Dec;8(4):458-463. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.192110. PMID 28057992
  • Yee CH, Wong JH, Chiu PK, Chan CK, Lee WM, Tsu JH, Teoh JY, Ng CF. Short-stay transurethral prostate surgery: A randomized controlled trial comparing transurethral resection in saline bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 Aug;8(3):316-22. doi: 10.1111/ases.12197. Epub 2015 Jun 3. PMID 26042336
  • Yip SK, Chan NH, Chiu P, Lee KW, Ng CF. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of hybrid bipolar transurethral vaporization and resection of the prostate with bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol. 2011 Dec;25(12):1889-94. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0269. Epub 2011 Sep 16. PMID 21923418
  • Teo JS, Lee YM, Ho HSS. An update on transurethral surgery for benign prostatic obstruction. Asian J Urol. 2017 Jul;4(3):195-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 15. PMID 29264231
  • McVary KT, Gange SN, Gittelman MC, Goldberg KA, Patel K, Shore ND, Levin RM, Rousseau M, Beahrs JR, Kaminetsky J, Cowan BE, Cantrill CH, Mynderse LA, Ulchaker JC, Larson TR, Dixon CM, Roehrborn CG. Minimally Invasive Prostate Convective Water Vapor Energy Ablation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasi PMID 26614889
  • Cantrill CH, Zorn KC, Elterman DS, Gonzalez RR. The Rezum system - a minimally invasive water vapor thermal therapy for obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can J Urol. 2019 Jun;26(3):9787-9793. PMID 31180311
  • McVary KT, Gittelman MC, Goldberg KA, Patel K, Shore ND, Levin RM, Pliskin M, Beahrs JR, Prall D, Kaminetsky J, Cowan BE, Cantrill CH, Mynderse LA, Ulchaker JC, Tadros NN, Gange SN, Roehrborn CG. Final 5-Year Outcomes of the Multicenter Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of a Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hy PMID 33872051

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05762198 · CRE-2022.537-T

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗