Menu
Recruiting NCT05761093

Patient and Physician Benefit/ Risk Preferences for Treatment of mPC in Hong Kong: a Discrete Choice Experiment

Observational Prostate Cancer

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Prostate Cancer. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Male.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Hong Kong
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Study to Evaluate Patient and Physician Benefit/ Risk Preferences for Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPC) in Hong Kong: a Discrete Choice Experiment

Overview

The objective of this study is to examine the preference weightings in term of risk/ benefit attributes of treatment in physician and prostate cancer patients from different stages of disease.

Primary outcome measures

  • Patient preferences for treatment attributes in prostate cancer from different stages of disease [Time frame: 15 minutes (Once through survey)]
  • The Preference weighting from Physicians involved in the treatment of prostate cancer in term of risk/benefit attributes of treatment. [Time frame: 15 minutes (Once through survey)]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • To examine the effect of socio-economic status on preference weighing [Time frame: 15 minutes (Once through survey)]
  • To examine the status of comorbidities on preference weighing [Time frame: 15 minutes (Once through survey)]
  • To examine their willingness of trading off survival with improving QOL [Time frame: 15 minutes (Once through survey]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • aged 18 years or older,
  • diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer within 5 years,
  • able to read and write,
  • accepting and signing the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • if patients are unable to complete the survey by themselves due to physical or psychological reasons,
  • deemed ineligible by treating physicians if patients are unable to complete the survey by themselves due to physical or psychological reasons,
  • deemed ineligible by treating physicians

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover

Study locations

Hong Kong · 1 center
  • Prince of Wales Hospital — Shatin

Publications

  • Sartor O, de Bono JS. Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 15;378(7):645-657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1701695. Epub 2018 Feb 7. No abstract available. PMID 29412780
  • Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Van Manen L, Svenson O. Patient-focussed decision-making in early-stage prostate cancer: insights from a cognitively based decision aid. Health Expect. 2004 Jun;7(2):126-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00271.x. PMID 15117387
  • Aning JJ, Wassersug RJ, Goldenberg SL. Patient preference and the impact of decision-making aids on prostate cancer treatment choices and post-intervention regret. Curr Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(Suppl 3):S37-44. doi: 10.3747/co.19.1287. PMID 23355792
  • Uemura H, Matsubara N, Kimura G, Yamaguchi A, Ledesma DA, DiBonaventura M, Mohamed AF, Basurto E, McKinnon I, Wang E, Concialdi K, Narimatsu A, Aitoku Y. Patient preferences for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan: a discrete-choice experiment. BMC Urol. 2016 Nov 4;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0182-2. PMID 27814714
  • Hauber AB, Arellano J, Qian Y, Gonzalez JM, Posner JD, Mohamed AF, Gatta F, Tombal B, Body JJ. Patient preferences for treatments to delay bone metastases. Prostate. 2014 Nov;74(15):1488-97. doi: 10.1002/pros.22865. Epub 2014 Aug 17. PMID 25132622
  • Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530. No abstract available. PMID 10834905
  • Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, Ulys A, Vjaters E, Polyakov S, Jievaltas M, Luz M, Alekseev B, Kuss I, Kappeler C, Snapir A, Sarapohja T, Smith MR; ARAMIS Investigators. Darolutamide in Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1235-1246. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815671. Epub 2019 Feb 14. PMID 30763142
  • Gravis G, Fizazi K, Joly F, Oudard S, Priou F, Esterni B, Latorzeff I, Delva R, Krakowski I, Laguerre B, Rolland F, Theodore C, Deplanque G, Ferrero JM, Pouessel D, Mourey L, Beuzeboc P, Zanetta S, Habibian M, Berdah JF, Dauba J, Baciuchka M, Platini C, Linassier C, Labourey JL, Machiels JP, El Kouri C, Ravaud A, Suc E, Eymard JC, Hasbini A, Bousquet G, Soulie M. Androgen-deprivation therapy alone PMID 23306100

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05761093 · CRE-2022.301

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗