Menu
Recruiting NCT05564689

Absolute Coronary Flow in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Observational Left Bundle-Branch Block Heart Failure Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Dilated Cardiomyopathy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Intracoronary flow and pressure.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Left Bundle-Branch Block, Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Denmark
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with LVEF of ≤35% and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, approximately one-third of CRT-recipients do not improve after therapy (non-responders), despite meeting the required criteria. Previous studies have documented that the positive respons to CRT is related to the delayed electrical activation of the left ventricle in patients with LBBB. It has also been illustrated that non-ischemic CRT-candidates with LBBB demonstrate lower regional myocardial blood flow and metabolism in the septum. Additionally, it has been suggested that LBBB can lead to impaired coronary blood flow in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). This observation is based on an echocardiography-based study, that showed that the percentage of diastolic flow duration (%DD) in LAD was shorter in patients with LBBB compared to the control-group and patients with right-ventricular pacing. It has been demonstrated that CRT has positive effects on septal myocardial perfusion in patients with HF and LBBB. The dominant hypothesis explaining this phenomenon is built on improved septal myocardial work after CRT-implantation, which leads to increased myocardial energy and therefore increased myocardial perfusion. In contrast, it has been suggested that due to re-established synchronous left ventricular electrical activation, CRT reduces the septal intramyocardial pressure in early diastole, leading to a relatively longer antegrade flow duration in LAD. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of CRT on coronary blood flow in LAD in patients with non-ischemic HF and LBBB. The investigators hypothesize that increased LV-function after CRT not only is due to resynchronized LV ejection and filling, but also improved coronary flow. The study aims to enroll 60 patients with heart failure due to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, LBBB, with or without CRT. All patients meeting the criteria will be recruited from the outpatient clinic at the Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital. Invasive flow measurements in the LAD, including fractional flow reserve (FFR), absolute coronary flow and -reserve will be conducted with the CRT on and off, respectively.

Interventions

  • Procedure Intracoronary flow and pressure
    Measurement of absolute coronary flow and resistance

Primary outcome measures

  • Absolute coronary flow [Time frame: During procedure]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18
  • QRS ≥ 150 ms before implantation
  • Heart failure because of dilated cardiomypathy
  • Sinus rhythm
  • Stable medical therapy
  • LBBB
  • CRT device

Exclusion criteria

  • eGFR < 30 ml/min
  • Severe valvular heart disease
  • Permanent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
  • Prior PCI or CABG
  • Prior myocardial infarction
  • Heart failure due to ischemic heart disease
  • Other type of device (pacemaker, ICD)
  • Not able to give informed consent
  • Does not understand Danish

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Case-only

Study locations

Denmark · 1 center
  • Aalborg Universityhospital — Aalborg

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05564689 · N-20220040

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗