Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT05353907

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Improving Imaging Assessment of Multiple Myeloma

Observational Myeloma

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Whole Body MRI.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Myeloma. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Up to 30% of patients with newly diagnosed/suspected myeloma cannot undergo or do not tolerate whole body MRI (WB-MRI). A number of factors may be contributory. First, WB-MRI protocols can take in excess of 1 hour. Patients must remain still within a narrow bore scanner with multiple MRI coils that can be claustrophobic. Second, there is significant acoustic noise that can be heard despite the use of ear protection. Third, 80% of patients will experience bone pain or fracture at some point during their illness, affecting their comfort within the scanner. Fourth, patients also have higher anxiety. One review reported up to 30% of patients experienced considerable apprehension and up to 10% severe psychological distress when undergoing MRI. Finally, myeloma is predominantly an illness of the elderly and co-morbid conditions decrease patients' ability to tolerate a long scan. When WB-MRI cannot be performed, NICE recommend whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT), which the investigators know offers decreased diagnostic performance in terms of marrow assessment and focal lesion detection. The investigators believe that using a novel CT technique - dual-energy CT (DECT) - may offer better diagnostic performance over standard WB-CT in myeloma patients. What the investigators seek to do in this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of DECT in a cohort of untreated patients; and compare the performance of DECT to simulated standard CT (data simulated from the DECT) and also to WB-MRI (reference standard alongside bone marrow biopsy results. The investigators will assess both subjective visual analysis of DECT images as well as CT quantitative values for the bone marrow. Secondary objectives include assessment of patient experience across both imaging tests and assessment of intra \& inter observer variability in subjective visual analysis

Interventions

  • Radiation Whole Body MRI
    Once recruited, the participant will undergo a WB-MRI scan as part of their usual standard-of-care. As part of the research study, the participant will be consented to undertake an additional WB-DECT research scan at a time of their choosing (on the same day as the MRI scan, or on another day, if preferred)

Primary outcome measures

  • Sensitivity and specificity of WB-DECT [Time frame: Baseline (both scans acquired at the same time point)]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Qualitatively measure patient experience of WB-DECT compared to WB-MRI . [Time frame: Baseline (both scans acquired at the same time point)]
  • Intra & inter observer variability in subjective visual analysis and quantitative analysis of WB-DECT [Time frame: Baseline (both scans acquired at the same time point)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with suspected or newly diagnosed myeloma

Exclusion criteria

  • No previous treatment for myeloma
  • No concurrent cancer elsewhere
  • No contraindications to CT or MRI scans
  • Routine, standard of care cut-off for minimum renal function (eGFR > 40 ml/min/1.73 m2) in order to receive IV gadolinium-based contrast media.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT05353907 · 274302

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗