Real World Insights During Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with Isatuximab
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Digital Health Coaching Program, Fitbit.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes for Individuals with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Isatuximab: Real-World Insights from Patient Reported, Wearable, and Qualitative Data in the Context of Digital Health Coaching
Overview
This descriptive study aims to evaluate the experience of adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma receiving standard of care isatuximab-irfc through collection of quantitative, qualitative and wearable data. Fifty adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma receiving standard of care isatuximab-irfc will be enrolled across 2 sites, The University of California San Francisco and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Consented participants will be enrolled in a 3-month digital health coaching program through which electronic patient reported outcomes and wearable activity data will be collected. Outcomes include treatment experience, quality of life, financial toxicity, treatment adherence, symptom burden and health self-efficacy. These will be captured by patient reported outcome measures including the Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment- Real World (PQAT-RW), Patient Global Impression of Change/Severity (PGIC/S), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma (QLQ-MY20), and the European QoL-5 Dimensions (EQ5D), Cancer Behavior Inventory-Brief Form (CBI-B), Center for Adherence Support Evaluation (CASE) Medication Adherence Index, Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) Instrument. Clinical data, including treatment history, healthcare utilization, and co-morbidities, as well as demographic data will be collected via the electronic health record from each clinical site. This data will be complemented by qualitative data from a selected cohort of study participants with a focus on treatment experience ranging from infusion burden, toxicity management, to overall quality of life. Evaluation of this data in combination will be used to better understand the treatment experience of individuals on standard of care isatuximab-irfc specifically, and with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma generally, contributing to an existing gap in the literature regarding patient reported outcomes from diverse data sources. Outcomes will be analyzed with attention to the relationship between social determinants of health, including race, ethnicity, and geographic location, and treatment experience as reflected in both the qualitative and quantitative data.
Interventions
- Behavioral Digital Health Coaching Program
consisting of weekly calls and delivery of evidence-based content across health and wellness domains (e.g. nutrition, exercise, physical, emotional and financial health) up to 4 times weekly via text, email or mobile application. - Device Fitbit
A wrist-worn activity tracker allowing for the capture of physical activity, including but not limited to step-count and minutes of activity, to be captured daily.
Primary outcome measures
- Change in Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment Real World version (PQAT-RW) [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
- Qualitative Interview [Time frame: Within the last month of study participation]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
- Change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
- Change in Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma (QLQ-MY20) [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
- Change in European QoL-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
- Change in Cancer Behavior Inventory-Brief Form (CBI-B) [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
- Change in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scale [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
- Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
- Change in Center for Adherence Support Evaluation (CASE) Medication Adherence Index [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
- Change in Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) Instrument [Time frame: Change in baseline perception of treatment experience at 3 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age 18 or older
- Diagnosis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma corresponding to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) package insert for isatuximab-irfc (Sarclisa®).
- Confirmed or planned treatment with intravenous isatuximab-irfc for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma as standard-of-care therapy. Concurrent therapy with other agents (e.g., pomalidomide) is allowed.
- Access to and willingness to use a smartphone or other device through which they can send and receive text messages, emails and/or access a mobile application.
- Willingness to wear and have data collected by a Fitbit
- Ability to engage in physical activity as evidenced by an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of less than or equal to 2
Exclusion criteria
- Individuals who are terminally ill, defined as individuals identified by their physician as likely having 6 months or less to live, or those individuals transitioned to comfort measures only (meaning only supportive care measures without curative focused treatment)
- Individuals for whom there is documentation of inability to provide consent in the medical record.
- Individuals receiving isatuximab-irfc subcutaneously
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- N/A
- Model
- Single group
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Other
Study locations
United States · 2 centers
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center — Houston
- University of Washington — Seattle
Publications
- Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC, Scher HI, Kris MG, Hudis C, Schrag D. Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment. JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7156. PMID 28586821
- Cocks K, Cohen D, Wisloff F, Sezer O, Lee S, Hippe E, Gimsing P, Turesson I, Hajek R, Smith A, Graham L, Phillips A, Stead M, Velikova G, Brown J; EORTC Quality of Life Group. An international field study of the reliability and validity of a disease-specific questionnaire module (the QLQ-MY20) in assessing the quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jul;43(11):1670-8. PMID 17574838
- de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, Blinder V, Araujo FS, Hlubocky FJ, Nicholas LH, O'Connor JM, Brockstein B, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK, Cella D. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):476-484. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30369. Epub 2016 Oct 7. PMID 27716900
- Girault A, Ferrua M, Lalloue B, Sicotte C, Fourcade A, Yatim F, Hebert G, Di Palma M, Minvielle E. Internet-based technologies to improve cancer care coordination: current use and attitudes among cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(4):551-557. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Feb 4. PMID 25661828
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30. PMID 18929686
- Heitzmann CA, Merluzzi TV, Jean-Pierre P, Roscoe JA, Kirsh KL, Passik SD. Assessing self-efficacy for coping with cancer: development and psychometric analysis of the brief version of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI-B). Psychooncology. 2011 Mar;20(3):302-12. doi: 10.1002/pon.1735. PMID 20878830
- Kent EE, Ambs A, Mitchell SA, Clauser SB, Smith AW, Hays RD. Health-related quality of life in older adult survivors of selected cancers: data from the SEER-MHOS linkage. Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;121(5):758-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29119. Epub 2014 Nov 4. PMID 25369293
- Madduri D, Dhodapkar MV, Lonial S, Jagannath S, Cho HJ. SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: T-Cell-Directed Immune Therapies for Multiple Myeloma: Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells and Bispecific T-Cell-Engaging Agents. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Sep;19(9):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 7. PMID 31427259
Identifiers
NCT: NCT05053607 · 2021-0309