Menu
Recruiting NCT04983082

Portsmouth CORE-D Routine Care Data Repository

Observational Adult Hospital Patients at Risk of Adverse Outcomes

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Adult Hospital Patients at Risk of Adverse Outcomes. Basic parameters: from 16 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United Kingdom
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Portsmouth Clinical Outcomes REsearch Database (CORE-D)- a Research Database of Routine Electronically Recorded Patient Data to Model Adverse Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Resource Usage

Overview

An integrated database of depersonalised routine hospital patient data consisting of demographic and disease attributes, physiological or laboratory measurements, care contacts and interventions along with associated clinical outcomes. The database is an essential resource for the development and testing of risk models and classification systems, modified as necessary for patient subgroups, which can then be introduced into clinical care to improve patient outcomes. It can also be used for large scale simulations to evaluate interventions.

Detailed description

The aims and objectives of this database of depersonalised routinely collected hospital patient data are to:

* Conduct epidemiological and observational studies of acute hospital care. * Develop and use algorithms and risk models to identify the deteriorating / sick adult so that interventions and enhanced care can be provided in a timelier manner with consequent resource and outcome improvements. This covers both the deteriorating inpatient at risk of adverse outcomes and people in the local community at risk of hospitalisation or in need of other health services. * Retrospectively evaluate interventions e.g. impact of system-wide clinical pathway introduction * Conduct simulations of clinical pathways

Primary outcome measures

  • In-hospital death [Time frame: At 24 hours after an observation assessment or physiological measurement]
  • In-hospital death [Time frame: 30 days after admission]
  • Unanticipated ICU admission [Time frame: At 24 hours after an observation assessment or physiological measurement]
  • Unanticipated ICU admission [Time frame: 30 days after admission]
  • Cardiac arrest [Time frame: At 24 hours after an observation assessment or physiological measurement]
  • Cardiac arrest [Time frame: 30 days after admission]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
  • Diagnosis of Corona Virus Disease (COVID) infection [Time frame: 48 hours after presentation]
  • Diagnosis of Corona Virus Disease (COVID) infection [Time frame: At 48 hours after an observation assessment or physiological measurement]
  • Detection of Acute Organ Dysfunction [Time frame: 24 hours after presentation]
  • Detection of Acute Organ Dysfunction [Time frame: 48 hours after presentation]
  • Detection of Acute Organ Dysfunction [Time frame: 72 hours after presentation]
  • Detection of Acute Organ Dysfunction [Time frame: 1 week after presentation]
  • Detection of Acute Organ Dysfunction [Time frame: 30 days after presentation]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult presenting at the acute hospital or receiving services from the hospital

Exclusion criteria

  • Adults who have registered an opt out of research with National Health Service (NHS) Digital
  • Adults who have contacted the hospital to ask that their records are not to be included in this study

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

United Kingdom · 1 center
  • Queen Alexandra Hospital — Portsmouth

Identifiers

NCT: NCT04983082 · PHU/2021/11

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗