BLOCK-TRAUMA Study

Background

Regional anesthesia has become an essential component of multimodal analgesia in trauma care, providing effective pain relief, reducing opioid requirements, improving respiratory function, and facilitating early rehabilitation. Advances in ultrasound-guided techniques have enabled clinicians to perform multiple peripheral nerve blocks and continuous catheter techniques in patients with complex polytrauma involving several anatomical regions.

Despite these advantages, there is currently no evidence-based framework defining the optimal extent of regional anesthesia in polytrauma patients. In contemporary trauma practice, some patients receive one regional block, whereas others undergo multiple single-injection blocks combined with continuous peripheral nerve catheters. Although increasing the number of regional techniques may improve analgesia, excessive regional anesthesia may also increase cumulative local anesthetic exposure, procedural burden, motor impairment, monitoring complexity, and the potential risk of adverse events. The concept of an optimal "regional anesthesia burden" has not previously been investigated.

Study Rationale

This study introduces the concept of Regional Anesthesia Burden (RAB), representing the overall intensity of regional anesthesia delivered during the acute management of polytrauma. Rather than evaluating individual block techniques, the study will investigate the cumulative impact of regional anesthesia on pain control, opioid requirements, functional recovery, and early clinical outcomes.

Regional Anesthesia Burden will be characterized using objective procedural variables, including:

number of peripheral nerve blocks; number of continuous regional anesthesia catheters; cumulative local anesthetic exposure during the first 72 hours; number of anatomical regions covered by regional anesthesia; expected motor block burden; total number of regional anesthesia procedures performed.

Study Design

This is a prospective observational cohort study. Consecutive adult patients with polytrauma receiving regional anesthesia as part of routine clinical care will be enrolled. No interventions beyond standard clinical practice will be performed.

Clinical management, including the choice of regional anesthesia technique, catheter placement, local anesthetic selection, concentration, and infusion regimen, will remain entirely at the discretion of the treating anesthesiologist according to institutional protocols.

Patients will be followed prospectively during the first seven days after injury. Pain intensity, opioid consumption, respiratory function, mobilization, complications, and recovery parameters will be recorded using standardized assessment tools.

Study Objectives

The primary objective is to determine whether increasing Regional Anesthesia Burden is associated with improved early clinical outcomes or whether excessive regional anesthesia is associated with diminishing clinical benefit and increased treatment-related risk.

Secondary objectives include evaluation of the relationship between Regional Anesthesia Burden and opioid consumption, functional recovery, pulmonary complications, motor impairment, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, and regional anesthesia-related complications.

Scientific Significance

The BLOCK-TRAUMA study is expected to provide the first prospective clinical evidence regarding the optimal extent of regional anesthesia in polytrauma patients. The results may contribute to future evidence-based recommendations regarding the appropriate use of multiple peripheral nerve blocks and continuous regional anesthesia techniques in severely injured patients and help define the balance between maximizing analgesia and minimizing procedural burden and complications.

• Pain Intensity [Срок оценки: Baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and Day 7 after injury.]
• Cumulative Local Anesthetic Dose [Срок оценки: Through Day 7 after injury.]
• Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity [Срок оценки: Through Day 7 after injury.]