Меню
Набор скоро начнётся NCT07692568

VIDEO LEARNING FOR EMPATHY, ETHICS AND FAMILY WITNESSED RESUSCITATION

Без фазы С лечением Family Witnessed Resuscitation Empathy Education Ethics Nursing Education Nursing

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: 360 Degree Virtual Reality Video, 2D Standard Video.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Family Witnessed Resuscitation, Empathy Education, Ethics Nursing, Education Nursing. Базовые параметры: Без ограничений · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Turkey (Türkiye)
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

THE EFFECT OF A VIDEO BASED DIGITAL LEARNING INTERVENTION ON NURSING STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF EMPATHY, ETHICAL SENSITIVITY, AND FAMILY WITNESSED RESUSCITATION IN THEIR PATIENT PERSPECTIVE EXPERIENCES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Обзор

This clinical trial (randomized controlled experimental study) aims to learn about the effects of presenting the family-witnessed CPR process from a patient's perspective through 360° virtual reality and 2D video within second-year nursing students. The primary question(s) / hypotheses it aims to answer are: * H1: Will the content validity ratio of the developed scenario be above 0.80? * H2: Is the increase in empathy scores (pre-test/post-test difference) of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher compared to the 2D video and control groups? * H3: Is the increase in ethical sensitivity scores of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher compared to the 2D video and control groups? * H4: Is the change in perception scores toward family-witnessed CPR more positive in the 360° VR group compared to the other groups, and is their mean SUS (System Usability Scale) score at or above the acceptability threshold of 70? * H5: Is the VES (Video Engagement Skale) score of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher than that of the 2D video group? Researchers will compare the 360° immersive video (360° VR) group, the 2-dimensional (2D) video group, and the control group to see if there are effects on empathy, ethical sensitivity, perception of risks-benefits of family presence, self-confidence regarding family presence, video engagement, and system usability. Participants will be asked to: * Watch the scenario reenactment involving a family-witnessed CPR process, recorded via a 360° camera (in either 360° VR or 2D format, depending on their assigned group). * Complete data collection tools consisting of the Introductory Information Form, "Jefferson Scale of Empathy", "Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire", "Family Presence Risk-Benefit Scale and Family Presence Self-Confidence Scale", "System Usability Scale (SUS-TR)", and "Video Engagement Skale(VES)".

Вмешательства

  • Поведенческое 360 Degree Virtual Reality Video
    Immersive 360-degree virtual reality video scenario of family-witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation presented from a patient perspective.
  • Поведенческое 2D Standard Video
    Standard 2-dimensional video scenario of family-witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation presented from a patient perspective.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Change in Jefferson Scale of Empathy Scores [Срок оценки: Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)]
  • Change in Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores [Срок оценки: Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)]
  • Change in Family Presence Risk Benefit Scale and Family Presence Self Confidence Scale Scores [Срок оценки: Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)]
  • System Usability Scale Scores [Срок оценки: Right after the intervention (Post-test)]
  • Video Engagement Scale Scores [Срок оценки: Right after the intervention (Post-test)]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Being a second-year undergraduate nursing student
  • Volunteering to participate in the study and signing the informed consent form
  • Not having participated in a similar virtual reality or family-witnessed CPR study before

Критерии исключения

  • Having a diagnosed neurological or psychiatric disorder that prevents using virtual reality glasses (such as epilepsy, severe vertigo, or motion sickness)
  • Having uncorrected visual or hearing impairments
  • Not completing all stages of the study (pre-test, intervention, or post-test)

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Простое слепое
Основная цель
Другое

Центры проведения

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 центр
  • Sakarya University — Sakarya

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07692568 · E-61923333-050.99-597961

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗