Evaluation of Multilayered PRF in Comparison With Connective Tissue Graft by Sohn Poncho's Technique on Peri-implant Mucosal Enhancement in the Esthetic Zone

Официальное название

Evaluation of Multilayered PRF in Comparison With Connective Tissue Graft by Sohn Poncho's Technique on Peri-implant Mucosal Enhancement in the Esthetic Zone. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Обзор

An effective biological seal is crucial for protecting and supporting dental implants, particularly in the anterior region for the desired esthetic outcome.PRF membrane and CTG has been utilized to improve peri-implant soft tissue thickness and increase the width of keratinized tissue around dental implants. The stability of the PRF membrane is maintained by securing it with the healing abutment of the implant. While a few longitudinal studies have assessed the benefits of using PRF membrane with Sohn's Poncho technique in the posterior region, its effectiveness in the anterior region of the mouth remains to be evaluated.

Подробное описание

An effective biological seal is crucial for protecting and supporting dental implants, particularly in the anterior region for the desired esthetic outcome.13, 14 Recent studies have shown that the multilayering of the PRF membrane around implants have the same effect on peri-implant mucosal thickness in comparison to the gold standard which is the connective tissue graft without further patient morbidity 13, 14. PRF membrane and CTG has been utilized to improve peri-implant soft tissue thickness and increase the width of keratinized tissue around dental implants. The stability of the PRF membrane is maintained by securing it with the healing abutment of the implant. While a few longitudinal studies have assessed the benefits of using PRF membrane with Sohn's Poncho technique in the posterior region, its effectiveness in the anterior region of the mouth remains to be evaluated.7, 8 Additionally, the stabilized PRF membrane ensures prolonged exposure of the wound site to bioactive growth factors. Given these advantages, the potential benefits of using PRF membrane with dental implants in the anterior region need further exploration. Thus, this study focuses on comparing multilayering PRF membrane with the gold standard which is the CTG in healing period of 2nd stage implant surgery.

Вмешательства

• Процедура Platelet rich fibrin multilayered Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) A t the second stage
  The test group will be treated with dental implant + multilayered PRF membrane. In brief, local anesthesia will be administered, and a crestal incision will be made to access the implant site. A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be reflected, exposing the underlying bone. The osteotomy will be performed following the implant manufacturer's guidelines, and a titanium implant will be placed at the planned position. For the purposes of standardization, implants will be placed at subcrestal le
• Процедура Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants with CTG in the second stage
  The test group will be treated with dental implant and CTG. In brief, local anesthesia will be administered, and a crestal incision will be made to access the implant site. A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be reflected, exposing the underlying bone. The osteotomy will be performed following the implant manufacturer's guidelines, and a titanium implant will be placed at the planned position. For the purposes of standardization, implants will be placed at subcrestal level in both the grou

Первичные конечные точки

• Peri-implant soft tissue thickness [Срок оценки: Time Frame: 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months]

Вторичные конечные точки (3)

• width of the keratinized tissue around dental implants [Срок оценки: Time Frame: baseline, 3 and 6 months]
• Marginal bone loss [Срок оценки: 6 months]
• Postoperative patient satisfaction VAS 0-5 [Срок оценки: baseline, 2 weeks, 6 months]

Критерии участия

-Inclusion Criteria: Patients with single bounded missing tooth in the esthetic zone Patients in the age group of 21-65 years Patients having good oral hygiene (mean plaque score of < 25%) and with stable periodontal status.

-Exclusion Criteria: Smokers patients Patients with poor maintenance of oral hygiene, as determined by a mean plaque score of ≥ 25% despite efforts by the clinician to improve oral hygiene maintenance.

Patients with medically compromised conditions like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or any systemic diseases that may result in compromised hard and soft tissue healing.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Рандомизированное

Модель

Параллельные группы

Маскирование

Простое слепое

Основная цель

Лечение

Центры проведения

ОАЭ · 1 центр

• Gulf Medical University — Ajman

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07649239 · ZainabMDSperio

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗