Comparison of High-Intensity Interval Training With Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Brisk walk and jog, Normal walk.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain. Базовые параметры: 20 лет — 48 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Пакистан
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Comparison of High-Intensity Interval Training With Moderate-Intensity Connuous Training In Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial
Обзор
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the HIIT with MICT in chronic non-specific low back pain patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: * The broad aim of the study is to compare HIIT with MICT in pain reduction in chronic non-specific low back pain patients. * The purpose of this research is to compare HIIT with MICT on disability and quality of life among chronic non-specific low back pain patients. * It also attempts to investigate the relationship between the baseline attributes and outcome variables. Researcher will compare the HIIT to MICT to see the effects on CNSLBP Participants will be: * Allocated to HIIT or MICT group for 6 weeks. * Assessed pre and post intervention. * Continuously monitored during treatment sessions.
Вмешательства
- Другое Brisk walk and jog
High-Intensity Interval Training - Другое Normal walk
Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training
Первичные конечные точки
- Numeric Pain Rating Score (NPRS) [Срок оценки: 6 weeks]
Вторичные конечные точки (6)
- Modified Oswestry Disability Index for disability [Срок оценки: 6 weeks]
- Short Form-12 for Quality of Life [Срок оценки: 6 weeks]
- Modified Bruce Treadmill protocol for CV endurance [Срок оценки: 6 weeks]
- Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) for body composition [Срок оценки: 6 weeks]
- height and weight for Body Mass Index [Срок оценки: 6 weeks]
- Waist Hip Ratio for fat distribution [Срок оценки: 6 weeks]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Referred patients of back pain persisting for > 12 weeks with no identifiable specific cause or underlying pathology from DUH OPD who meet the eligibility criteria.
- Age group 20-48 with either gender.
- NPRS score ranging between 3 and 5 (mild to moderate).
- Modified ODI score is mild to moderate.
Критерии исключения
- Any client with a specific cause of LBP (neurological problems, fractures, malignancy, infections, or rheumatic diseases such as RA or ankylosing spondylitis).
- Any client with cardiopulmonary problems (recent myocardial infarction, uncontrolled hypertension, asthma, COPD).
- Any client with musculoskeletal disorders \[injuries limiting exercises, spine injuries, recent trauma (fracture), scoliosis by Forward Adam's test\].
- Any client with metabolic conditions (thyroid problems, uncontrolled diabetes).
- Pregnancy / first 3-6 months postpartum.
- Recent surgery.
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Двойное слепое
- Основная цель
- Лечение
Центры проведения
Пакистан · 1 центр
- Dr. Ariba Sohail (PT) — Karachi
Публикации
- 35. Mikat, RP. Validity And Reliability of Waist-To-Hip Ratio Measurements From Dual Digital-Photograph Anthropometry. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. May 2001. 33(5):p S241.
- Shirai Y, Momosaki R, Kokura Y, Kato Y, Okugawa Y, Shimizu A. Validation of Asian Body Mass Index Cutoff Values for the Classification of Malnutrition Severity According to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations. Nutrients. 2022 Nov 10;14(22):4746. doi: 10.3390/nu14224746. PMID 36432433
- Vasold KL, Parks AC, Phelan DML, Pontifex MB, Pivarnik JM. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Low-Cost Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2019 Jul 1;29(4):406-410. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0283. PMID 30507268
- Kotte EM, DE Groot JF, Bongers BC, Winkler AM, Takken T. Validity and Reproducibility of a New Treadmill Protocol: The Fitkids Treadmill Test. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Oct;47(10):2241-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000657. PMID 26378949
- Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, Tountas Y. Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Sep 28;5:55. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-55. PMID 17900374
- Cheak-Zamora NC, Wyrwich KW, McBride TD. Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey. Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):727-35. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9483-1. Epub 2009 May 8. PMID 19424821
- Sheahan PJ, Nelson-Wong EJ, Fischer SL. A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(25):2367-74. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647. Epub 2015 Mar 4. PMID 25738913
- Bijur PE, Latimer CT, Gallagher EJ. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):390-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01355.x. PMID 12670856
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07645859 · IRB-4535