Effect of Sensorimotor Training Versus Dual-task Training
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Sensorimotor Training, Dual-Task Training, Conventional Physical Therapy.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Stroke. Базовые параметры: 40 лет — 60 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Пакистан
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Comparative Effects of Sensorimotor Training and Dual-Task Training on Proprioception, Balance, Functional Mobility and Fall Risk in Stroke Patients
Обзор
The aim of this study is to determine the comparative effects of sensorimotor training and dual-task training on propriocetion, balance, functional mobility and fall risk in stroke patients.
Подробное описание
Stroke is one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide and commonly results in impaired proprioception, balance deficits, reduced functional mobility, gait disturbances, and increased fall risk, particularly in chronic stroke patients. Stroke survivors often experience decreased sensory-motor integration, impaired postural control, reduced coordination, and difficulty performing dual tasks during daily activities, all of which negatively affect independence and quality of life. Sensorimotor training focuses on improving proprioception, neuromuscular control, balance, and postural stability through sensory and motor integration exercises, whereas dual-task training emphasizes simultaneous performance of motor and cognitive tasks to improve cognitive-motor coordination, gait performance, dynamic balance, and functional mobility. The aim of this study is to determine the comparative effects of sensorimotor training and dual-task training on proprioception, balance, functional mobility, and fall risk in chronic stroke patients. This study will be a randomized clinical trial. A non-probability convenience sampling technique will be used to recruit 54 participants diagnosed with chronic stroke. This study will be conducted at Nishtar Hospital, Multan and District Headquarter Hospital, Rajnapur. Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups through sealed opaque envelope method. Group A will receive sensorimotor training, Group B will receive dual-task training, while Group C will receive conventional physical therapy exercises. All groups will perform their respective exercise protocols for 30 minutes, three times a week for 8 weeks. Participants will be evaluated before and after the intervention through Joint Position Sense Test (JPS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Mini-BESTest, 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) to assess the effects of interventions on proprioception, balance, functional mobility, and fall risk. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26.
Вмешательства
- Другое Sensorimotor Training
Somatosensory Training(SMT), for 30 minutes, thrice a week for 8 weeks. Warm-up and cool down will be given. - Другое Dual-Task Training
Dual-Task Training, for 30 minutes, thrice a week for 8 weeks. Warm-up and cool down will be given. - Другое Conventional Physical Therapy
Conventional Physical Therapy, for 30 minutes, thrice a week for 8 weeks. Warm-up and cool down will be given.
Первичные конечные точки
- Mini-BESTest Scale [Срок оценки: 8th week]
Вторичные конечные точки (1)
- 6-minute Walk Test(6MWT) [Срок оценки: 8th week]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- A diagnosis of stroke; ≥6 months after stroke onset
- Able to walk independently for at least 10 minutes
- Mini-BESTest score ≤21 indicating balance impairment.
- MoCA score ≥21 to confirm adequate cognitive function
Критерии исключения
- Severe musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., advanced osteoarthritis, recent fractures) that significantly affect mobility or balance.
- Significant receptive or expressive aphasia
- Unstable heart or lung conditions preventing exercise.
- Active psychiatric disorders (e.g., major depression, schizophrenia)
- Not community-dwelling before the stroke event
- Involved in similar rehab or studies within the last 3 months
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Двойное слепое
- Основная цель
- Лечение
Центры проведения
Пакистан · 1 центр
- DHQ Rajanpur — Rajanpur
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07628374 · REC/RCR & AHS/25/0215