AP-NOSES: A Prospective Multicentre Registry of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction, Transabdominal Specimen Extraction.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Colorectal Neoplasms, Incisional Hernia. Базовые параметры: от 21 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Сингапур
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
AP-NOSES: A Prospective, Multicentre Registry of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Across the Asia-Pacific Region
Обзор
Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is a minimally invasive colorectal surgical technique in which the surgical specimen is removed through a natural orifice, including transanal or transvaginal routes, thereby avoiding an abdominal extraction incision. Observational studies suggest that NOSE may reduce wound-related morbidity and improve postoperative recovery, but prospective multicenter data evaluating long-term outcomes remain limited. AP-NOSES is a prospective, multicenter observational registry evaluating clinical, patient-reported, and long-term wound outcomes following minimally invasive colorectal surgery with NOSE or transabdominal specimen extraction. The primary objective is to compare time to incisional hernia within 24 months between NOSE-eligible patients undergoing planned NOSE extraction and NOSE-eligible patients undergoing planned transabdominal extraction. Secondary objectives include evaluation of postoperative complications, extraction-related morbidity, bowel function, urinary and sexual function, oncologic outcomes, and long-term patient-reported and clinical outcomes across participating centers. This study does not alter routine clinical care. Surgical technique, perioperative management, and follow-up are performed according to local institutional practice.
Подробное описание
Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is an established minimally invasive colorectal surgical technique that enables removal of the surgical specimen through transanal or transvaginal routes while avoiding an abdominal specimen extraction incision. Existing retrospective studies and meta-analyses suggest that NOSE may reduce postoperative pain, wound morbidity, and length of hospital stay without compromising oncologic outcomes. However, prospective multicenter data evaluating long-term abdominal wall outcomes and patient-reported outcomes remain limited.
Incisional hernia is a common long-term complication following colorectal surgery and is closely associated with the abdominal extraction site. By avoiding an abdominal extraction incision, NOSE may reduce extraction-site morbidity and long-term incisional hernia risk. AP-NOSES was designed to prospectively evaluate these outcomes in a multicenter setting using predefined eligibility criteria and a concurrent comparator cohort.
AP-NOSES is a prospective observational multicenter registry coordinated by Singapore General Hospital. Consecutive adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colorectal resection with planned intact specimen extraction are eligible for enrollment. Participating centers include tertiary colorectal units within the Asia-Pacific region.
The primary comparative analysis is conducted within a predefined NOSE-eligible cohort. Exposure groups are defined according to planned specimen extraction strategy:
1. Planned NOSE extraction (transanal or transvaginal), and 2. Planned transabdominal extraction among patients meeting protocol NOSE eligibility criteria.
Planned and achieved extraction routes, reasons for non-performance of NOSE, operative details, postoperative complications, and oncologic outcomes are prospectively recorded.
The primary outcome is time to incisional hernia within 24 months following index colorectal surgery.
Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, extraction-site morbidity, surgical site infection, readmission, reoperation, pathologic outcomes, patient-reported quality-of-life and functional outcomes, bowel function, urinary and sexual function in selected patients, and oncologic outcomes including recurrence and disease-free survival.
Patient-reported outcomes are assessed using validated instruments including EQ-5D-5L, Body Image Scale (BIS), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), and Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6), where applicable.
This study is observational and does not mandate changes to standard surgical or postoperative management. Data are entered into a secure centralized REDCap database using coded study identifiers.
Вмешательства
- Процедура Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Specimen extraction through a natural orifice, including transanal or transvaginal extraction, during minimally invasive colorectal surgery. - Процедура Transabdominal Specimen Extraction
Specimen extraction through an abdominal incision during minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
Первичные конечные точки
- Time to Incisional Hernia Within 24 Months [Срок оценки: 24 months after index surgery]
Вторичные конечные точки (10)
- Overall Postoperative Complications [Срок оценки: 30 days after surgery]
- Surgical Site Infection [Срок оценки: 30 days after surgery]
- Extraction-Site Complications [Срок оценки: 30 days after surgery]
- Length of Hospital Stay [Срок оценки: From date of surgery until hospital discharge, up to 30 days]
- EQ-5D-5L Score [Срок оценки: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery]
- Body Image Scale (BIS) Score [Срок оценки: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery]
- Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Score [Срок оценки: 6 months and 12 months after surgery]
- Local Recurrence [Срок оценки: Up to 24 months after surgery]
- Distant Recurrence [Срок оценки: Up to 24 months after surgery]
- Disease-Free Survival [Срок оценки: Up to 24 months after surgery]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Age 21 years or older
- Elective minimally invasive colorectal resection (laparoscopic or robotic intent)
- Planned intact specimen extraction
- Eligible for natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) or transabdominal specimen extraction according to study protocol
- Ability to provide informed consent
Критерии исключения
- Emergency colorectal surgery
- Planned transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)
- Planned ultralow anterior resection with planned anastomosis 3 cm or less from the anal verge
- Planned abdominoperineal resection (APR)
- Planned permanent end stoma without restoration of intestinal continuity
- Planned multivisceral resection
- Generalized peritonitis or uncontrolled intra-abdominal sepsis
- Pregnancy
- Pre-existing ventral or incisional hernia at the planned extraction site
- Planned specimen extraction through a prior laparotomy incision containing mesh
- Fixed distal obstruction, severe pelvic stenosis, or other anatomical constraint precluding intact specimen extraction
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Модель наблюдения
- Когортное
Центры проведения
Сингапур · 1 центр
- Singapore General Hospital — Singapore
Публикации
- den Hartog FPJ, van Egmond S, Poelman MM, Menon AG, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Tanis PJ, Deerenberg EB. The incidence of extraction site incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr;25(4):586-599. doi: 10.1111/codi.16455. Epub 2023 Jan 5. PMID 36545836
- Chin YH, Decruz GM, Ng CH, Tan HQM, Lim F, Foo FJ, Tai CH, Chong CS. Colorectal resection via natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic extraction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jan;25(1):35-48. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02330-6. Epub 2020 Aug 26. PMID 32851500
- Guan X, Liu Z, Longo A, Cai JC, Tzu-Liang Chen W, Chen LC, Chun HK, Manuel da Costa Pereira J, Efetov S, Escalante R, He QS, Hu JH, Kayaalp C, Kim SH, Khan JS, Kuo LJ, Nishimura A, Nogueira F, Okuda J, Saklani A, Shafik AA, Shen MY, Son JT, Song JM, Sun DH, Uehara K, Wang GY, Wei Y, Xiong ZG, Yao HL, Yu G, Yu SJ, Zhou HT, Lee SH, Tsarkov PV, Fu CG, Wang XS; International Alliance of NOSES. Interna PMID 30792863
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07615036 · 2026-0237