Computed Tomography Angiography Based Procedural Planning in PeRcutaneOus Coronary InterVEntion

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is routinely performed to treat obstructive CAD; however, conventional invasive coronary angiography provides limited information regarding plaque morphology, lesion composition, calcium distribution, vessel remodeling, and functional lesion significance. These limitations may affect procedural planning, device selection, procedural efficiency, and final PCI optimization.

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has evolved into a comprehensive non-invasive imaging modality capable of providing detailed anatomical and functional assessment of coronary lesions. In addition to defining stenosis severity, CCTA allows assessment of lesion length, vessel dimensions, plaque morphology, high-risk plaque characteristics, calcium burden, bifurcation anatomy, and vessel trajectory. Furthermore, computational fluid dynamics enable the derivation of CT-based fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), providing a non-invasive estimation of lesion-specific ischemia.

The CT-PROVE trial (Computed Tomography Angiography Based Procedural Planning in PeRcutaneOus Coronary InterVEntion) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate the implementation of a CCTA-derived virtual PCI planning strategy during invasive coronary intervention. The study aims to determine whether integrating a structured CT-based procedural planning workflow into PCI practice improves procedural efficiency and procedural outcomes compared with standard angiography-guided PCI.

Patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stabilized acute coronary syndrome who undergo clinically indicated CCTA and are subsequently referred for invasive coronary angiography will be screened for enrollment. Eligible patients presenting with at least one target lesion meeting predefined anatomical and/or functional criteria on CCTA will be considered for inclusion.

The study consists of two randomized groups:

1. CCTA-Guided PCI Group (Interventional Arm) 2. Standard PCI Group (Control Arm)

Patients randomized to the interventional arm will undergo PCI guided by a detailed pre-procedural CCTA-based virtual planning strategy. The virtual planning will be generated centrally by the core laboratory at Galway University Hospital using advanced anatomical and functional CT analysis software. The planning workflow includes evaluation of:

* Coronary anatomy and vessel course * Optimal angiographic projections * Lesion length * Proximal and distal landing zones * Reference vessel dimensions * Calcium burden and distribution * Plaque morphology and high-risk plaque features * Bifurcation anatomy and side branch characteristics * CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR)

Based on these analyses, operators will receive a structured procedural recommendation including suggested guiding catheter support, lesion preparation strategy, calcium modification techniques if necessary, stent sizing, landing zones, and bifurcation management approach.

Patients randomized to the control arm will undergo PCI according to standard clinical practice and operator discretion. Operators in the control arm will remain blinded to the advanced CCTA-derived procedural planning throughout the intervention. Use of intravascular imaging, physiological assessment, and adjunctive devices will be permitted according to standard care and operator judgment.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficiency and feasibility of integrating a CCTA-based PCI planning strategy into routine catheterization laboratory workflow.

Primary efficiency endpoints include:

* Procedural time * Radiation exposure during PCI * Contrast volume utilization

A co-primary feasibility endpoint will assess the rate of deviation between the recommended CCTA-based virtual procedural plan and the PCI procedure actually performed by the operator.

Secondary objectives include evaluating the effect of CCTA-guided PCI on:

* Procedural optimization * Functional revascularization * Angiographic outcomes * Procedural complications * Periprocedural myocardial infarction * Resource utilization and cost-effectiveness * Clinical outcomes during follow-up * Symptom improvement and angina status

Secondary procedural endpoints include quantitative flow ratio (QFR), residual stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), device success, procedural complications, and final stent expansion measurements assessed by core laboratory analysis.

Clinical follow-up will occur at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the index procedure. Follow-up assessments will include evaluation of adverse cardiovascular events, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, hospitalization, mortality, and angina status.

The trial also includes a parallel prospective observational registry (Def-CT-PROVE) enrolling patients with lesions identified as potentially significant by CCTA but deferred from PCI according to operator clinical judgment. This registry is intended to evaluate the natural history and clinical outcomes of deferred lesions adjudicated as hemodynamically or anatomically significant by the CCTA core laboratory analysis.

All CCTA analyses and virtual PCI planning will be performed centrally by the cardiovascular team at the Clinical Research Facility, Galway University Hospital, to ensure standardization and consistency across participating centers. The trial is designed to reflect real-world interventional practice across experienced European PCI centers while preserving operator autonomy in procedural decision-making.

The anticipated study duration for each participant is approximately 1 year. The planned sample size for the randomized CT-PROVE trial is 200 patients, with an additional prospective registry enrolling approximately 200 deferred lesions.

• Agreement between CCTA-based virtual PCI planning and operator standard planning [Срок оценки: During index PCI procedure]
• Vessel-Oriented Procedural Outcome [Срок оценки: During index PCI procedure]
• Final minimal stent diameter [Срок оценки: Immediately after index PCI procedure]
• Degree of functional revascularization [Срок оценки: Immediately after index PCI procedure]
• Maximum device size/reference vessel diameter ratio [Срок оценки: During index PCI procedure]
• PCI-related myocardial infarction rate [Срок оценки: Up to 48 hours after index PCI]
• Number of devices used during PCI [Срок оценки: During index PCI procedure]
• In-hospital peri-procedural adverse events [Срок оценки: Up to 30 days after index PCI]
• In-hospital resource utilization [Срок оценки: Index hospitalization (average of 2 days)]
• Target vessel-oriented composite outcome [Срок оценки: Up to 1 year after index PCI]
• Occurrence or worsening of exertional angina [Срок оценки: Up to 1 year after index PCI]
• Net adverse cardiovascular events [Срок оценки: Up to 1 year after index PCI]