Effect of Reactive Balance Training Versus Conventional Balance Training on Dynamic Stability and Change-of-Direction Performance in Competitive Tennis Players

Обзор

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of reactive balance training versus conventional balance training on dynamic stability and change of direction performance. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups. Each group will receive its respective intervention over a 6-week period. Outcome measures, including dynamic stability assessed by the Y-Balance Test and change-of-direction performance measured using the 505 Agility Test, will be evaluated at baseline and after the intervention. The study is designed to determine which training approach is more effective in improving balance and functional performance.

Подробное описание

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing two balance training interventions in competitive tennis players. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a reactive balance training group or a conventional balance training group. Both groups will undergo a supervised training program for 6 weeks, with three sessions per week. Each session will include a warm-up, a structured balance training program, and a cool-down phase. The reactive balance training group will perform exercises involving external perturbations, unpredictable stimuli, and sport-specific reactive movements such as sudden directional changes, partner-induced disturbances, and dual-task activities. The conventional balance training group will perform static and controlled balance exercises, including single-leg stance, balance board activities, and slow, predictable movements without external perturbations. Training intensity and duration will be standardized across both groups. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will be conducted to evaluate changes in dynamic stability and change-of-direction performance.

Вмешательства

• Другое Experimental group : Reactive Balance Training
  Participants will receive a structured reactive balance training program based on unpredictable perturbation-based exercises requiring rapid postural correction. The intervention will be conducted for 6 weeks (3 sessions/week) and will follow a progressive protocol.
• Другое Active comparator ( Conventional Balance Training)
  Participants will receive a structured conventional balance training program based on static and controlled exercises without external perturbation, conducted for 6 weeks (3 sessions/week).

Первичные конечные точки

• Dynamic Stability [Срок оценки: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (Post-intervention)]
• Change of Direction Performance [Срок оценки: Baseline (Pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (Post-intervention)]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

• Male and female competitive tennis players aged 18-25 years.
• Minimum 2 years of regular tennis training experience.
• Currently training at least 3 sessions per week (minimum 60 minutes per session).

Критерии исключения

• Recent injury (last 3 months)
• Neurological, balance or vestibular disorders
• Previous surgery
• Participation in any structured balance, neuromuscular, plyometric, or agility training program outside regular tennis practice during the study period.
• Use of ankle/knee braces or orthotic devices that may influence balance performance.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Рандомизированное

Модель

Параллельные группы

Маскирование

Простое слепое

Основная цель

Лечение

Центры проведения

Пакистан · 1 центр

• Ibadat International University, Islamabad (Iiui) — Islamabad

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07590674 · IIUI/RERC/ADT/2026/04/284

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗