Improving Patient Assessment After Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Iohexol renal clearance measurement, Cystatin C, Creatinine, Semi structured interview.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Acute Kidney Injury. Базовые параметры: 18 лет — 85 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Великобритания
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Обзор
The goal of this clinical trial is to improve patient care after acute kidney injury (AKI). It has three related parts. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is creatinine or cystatin a more reliable assessment of kidney function after AKI? 2. What are the experiences of patients after AKI? 3. What interventions should be recommended to improve assessment and support of patients after AKI? Participants will be asked to do one or more of: * blood tests to measure kidney function in different ways * have measurement of their body composition * complete questionnaires about their symptoms * have an interview with a researcher about their experiences * discussion to develop an action plan based on findings
Вмешательства
- Диагностический тест Iohexol renal clearance measurement
Gold standard measurement of glomerular filtration rate. - Диагностический тест Cystatin C
Estimated GFR using serum cystatin C - Диагностический тест Creatinine
eGFR from serum creatinine level - Другое Semi structured interview
Semi structured interview to explore patient experiences. Purposive sampling will be used to explore a wide range of perspectives and transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis to develop codes and themes. - Другое Participatory workshop
Group workshop using qualitative methods. Purposive sampling will be used to explore a wide range of perspectives and transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis to develop codes and themes. These will be used to develop consensus recommendations. - Диагностический тест Metagenome analysis
Analysis of the metagenome using faecal samples of participants after acute kidney injury - Диагностический тест Bioimpedance analysis
Estimation of body composition - Другое Patient reported outcome measures
EQ-5D-5L, KSQ, WHO-DAS 2.0, K10 - Другое Measurement of physical performance
Hand grip, Short physical performance battery
Первичные конечные точки
- The proportion of eligible patients who agree to participate [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- The proportion of participants who have all three measurements (eGFR-cystatin, eGFR-creatinine and measured GFR) [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Standard deviation of the difference between measured GFR and eGFR-creatinine and eGFR-cystatin [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- The proportion of patients with eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 from eGFR-cystatin compared with eGFR creatinine [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Gut microbiome composition [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Codes and themes related to patient experience after AKI, identified from systematic qualitative analysis of interview transcripts [Срок оценки: 3 - 12 months]
- Production of a document of recommended next steps through MDT development during participatory workshops [Срок оценки: At completion of third workshop 3 years after enrolment]
Вторичные конечные точки (10)
- The mean difference between eGFR-cystatin and eGFR-creatinine [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- The mean difference between iohexol measured GFR and each estimated GFR method (creatinine and cystatin) [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Correlation between eGFR creatinine and eGFR cystatin [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Correlation between iohexol measured GFR and each estimated GFR method (creatinine and cystatin) [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Bias between iohexol measured GFR and each estimated GFR method (creatinine and cystatin) [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Accuracy of eGFR creatinine and eGFR cystatin compared with iohexol measured GFR as assessed by the percentage of estimated values within 30% of measured GFR (P30) [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Correlation of muscle mass with the percentage difference between eGFR-cystatin and eGFR-creatinine [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Correlation of physical function with the percentage difference between eGFR-cystatin and eGFR-creatinine [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Correlation of patient reported outcomes with the percentage difference between eGFR-cystatin and eGFR-creatinine [Срок оценки: 3 months]
- Barriers to implementation of recommendations as identified through MDT discussion at participatory workshops [Срок оценки: At completion of third workshop 3 years after enrolment]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
Observational study workstream
- Age 18-85 years
- AKI stage 2 or 3 during hospital admission OR AKI stage 1 of at least 7 days duration during hospital admission
- 60-90 days after peak creatinine Qualitative interview workstream
- Age 18-85 years
- AKI during hospital admission
- 60-90 days after peak creatinine Participatory workshop workstream
- Age 18-85 years
- Relevant experience (as assessed by the investigator) which could include personal experience of an episode of hospitalised AKI as a patient of carer, experience of managing AKI or related problems in a professional capacity or knowledge of a particular community.
Критерии исключения
Observational study workstream
- Inability to give informed consent
- No baseline creatinine available in previous 12 months
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Current treatment with dialysis
- Renal transplant
- Pacemaker in situ
- Previous amputation
- Allergy to Omnipaque contrast agent (WP1 only)
- Manifest thyrotoxicosis (WP1 only)
- Ascites or significant (grade 3 to 4) peripheral oedema, defined as ≥6 mm pit, lasting for >1 minute after 5-second compression over tibia or medial malleolus (WP1 only) Qualitative interview workstream
- Inability to give informed consent
- No baseline creatinine available in previous 12 months
- Current treatment with dialysis
- Renal transplant
- Receiving palliative care Participatory workshop workstream
- Inability to give informed consent
- Inability to communicate in English (the qualitative workshops will be held in English)
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Модель наблюдения
- Когортное
Центры проведения
Великобритания · 1 центр
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust — Derby
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07569588 · 25019