Testing a Peer-Support Group for Veterans Who Hear Voices

Veterans have a higher prevalence than non-Veterans of Schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD). These Veterans often struggle with social integration-e.g., participation in work, housing, and citizenship-due to symptoms, stigma, and psychosocial functioning deficits. They are at high risk of homelessness and suicide, and the impact on overall mortality is comparable to that of smoking and greater than obesity and alcohol abuse. SSD diagnoses are a significant cause of disability and a drain on VA resources. Auditory hallucinations (AH) are particularly linked to social withdrawal. Stigma against voice-hearing leads to silence, internalized shame, and social isolation, fueling cycles of avoidance and distress. Veteran Voices and Visions (VVV) is a psychosocial group intervention for Veterans with psychosis based on the Hearing Voices (HV) approach that reduces distress related to psychosis and builds a sense of belonging for Veterans living with psychosis. This intervention is hypothesized to increase social integration.

VVV takes a recovery-oriented, peer-led, Veteran-centered approach to understanding and reframing psychosis that emphasizes personal meaning and destigmatization. Pilot data indicates the approach reduces distress due to AH and fosters a sense of belonging. Research with Veterans with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) shows a high sense of belonging is protective against suicidal ideation. The proposed study would be the first ever to test the efficacy of a HV-inspired approach. If successful, it could transform how VA addresses psychosis by mobilizing the peer workforce to the benefit of a vulnerable group of Veterans.

Specific Aims: Aim 1: Assess VVV efficacy: At each site, 80 Veterans will be randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of VVV or a Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP) group. Facilitators will be regularly supervised, and group sessions will be video recorded for fidelity review. Veterans will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks), and follow-up (24 weeks) on the proximal outcomes of distress related to AH and sense of belonging, and distal outcome of social functioning. Secondary outcomes include severity of symptoms, self-efficacy, subjective recovery, self-stigma, loneliness, and hope.

Hypothesis: Veterans in VVV will have reduced distress due to AH and increased sense of belonging relative to Veterans in WRAP at the end of the intervention, and they will have increased social functioning at 24-week follow up.

Aim 2: Identify contextual factors that support or impede VVV implementation in the context of routine care. The investigators will use the updated Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide interviews with VVV facilitators, and local and national mental health leadership. The investigators will use rapid analysis on the resulting qualitative data to assess the context to support implementation of VVV (if effective).

Methodology: This is a 4-year hybrid 1 efficacy trial comparing VVV and WRAP across 2 VA sites.

Path to Translation/Implementation: A hybrid 1 trial is when an intervention is tested for effectiveness while collecting implementation data that could inform future delivery in real-world settings. Adding implementation assessments is a modest investment that does not impede the full test of an intervention's effectiveness and speeds the pace of the research pipeline, which often moves evidence-based practices (EBPs) into real-world settings much too slowly. The next step could be an implementation-focused trial.