Меню
Идёт набор NCT07553780

Serial PSMA PET for Therapy Monitoring in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Наблюдательное High-risk Prostate Cancer PSMA PET Treatment Response Therapy Monitoring

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
Это наблюдательное исследование: исследуемое лечение участникам по протоколу не назначают.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: High-risk Prostate Cancer, PSMA PET, Treatment Response, Therapy Monitoring. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Мужчины.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Китай
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Serial PSMA PET for Treatment Response Monitoring in Newly Diagnosed Clinically Significant, Treatment-Naïve Prostate Cancer - A Prospective, Multicenter Study

Обзор

This prospective, multicenter study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of serial PSMA PET for therapy monitoring in patients with newly diagnosed clinically significant prostate cancer. Clinically significant prostate cancer is defined as Gleason score ≥7.Patients will undergo baseline PSMA PET/CT prior to any treatment. A second PSMA PET/CT will be performed either at PSA recurrence (PSA rise ≥2 ng/mL above nadir after radiotherapy or biochemical progression per PCWG3 criteria) or at a fixed time window of 12-24 months after treatment completion for those without biochemical recurrence. Primary Outcome: 1\. Absolute and relative change in SUVmax from baseline to follow-up PSMA PET, correlated with treatment response categories (complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease) defined by a composite reference standard (PSA kinetics, conventional imaging, clinical outcomes). \[Time Frame: Baseline and follow-up (up to 24 months)\] Secondary Outcomes: 1. Absolute and relative change in the number of PSMA-avid lesions (primary tumor, nodal, bone metastases) as a supportive exploratory endpoint. 2. Proportion of patients with treatment strategy change following serial PSMA PET. 3. Agreement between PSMA PET response (≥30% decrease in SUVmax) and PSA50 response (≥50% PSA decline) using Cohen's kappa. 4. Agreement between PSMA PET response and PSA90 response (≥90% PSA decline). 5. Prognostic value of baseline and follow-up PSMA PET parameters for progression-free survival (PFS). 6. Prognostic value of baseline and follow-up PSMA PET parameters for time to castration resistance (ADT-treated patients only). 7. Subgroup analyses by treatment type (radiotherapy, ADT, chemotherapy), baseline disease burden (oligometastatic vs. polymetastatic), and Gleason grade group (≤7 vs. ≥8). 8. Inter-reader agreement for PSMA-avid lesion counts. \[Time Frame: Up to 2 years, except inter-reader agreement at baseline\] Need: Current treatment response evaluation relies on PSA changes and conventional imaging, which lack sensitivity and accuracy for early assessment. PSMA PET has demonstrated superior sensitivity for detecting prostate cancer lesions, but its role in longitudinal therapy monitoring remains undefined, with no specific regulatory approval for this indication. Prospective data on serial PSMA PET to guide treatment decisions in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7) are urgently needed. Inclusion Criteria: 1. Newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed clinically significant prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥7. 2. Planned curative-intent or systemic therapy. 3. Baseline PSMA PET performed prior to any treatment. 4. Age ≥18 years. 5. Written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Prior prostate cancer treatment before baseline PSMA PET. 2. Contraindication to PSMA PET imaging. 3. Other active malignancy within past two years (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer). 4. Unable to comply with follow-up schedule.

Подробное описание

Background and Rationale Prostate cancer is the fastest-growing male malignancy in China, with an average annual increase of approximately 12.6% over the past decade. The concept of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) distinguishes patients who require active treatment from those with indolent disease. For this study, csPCa is defined as Gleason score ≥7 (grade group ≥2).

PSMA PET has emerged as the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting prostate cancer lesions, outperforming conventional imaging (CT, bone scan). However, its application has been primarily limited to single time-point assessments for initial staging or biochemical recurrence. Standardized response criteria such as RECIP 1.0 (Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT) and PPP (PSMA PET Progression) criteria have been validated in the context of radiopharmaceutical therapy and show robust prognostic value (HR for mortality 3.48; 95% CI: 2.64-4.59) , but their role in patients treated with androgen signaling inhibitors is less clear due to potential "PSMA flare" or treatment-induced heterogeneous expression. Prospective data on serial PSMA PET for therapy monitoring in csPCa are urgently needed.

Study Design and Technical Phases This is a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. Eligible patients are newly diagnosed csPCa with Gleason score ≥7, scheduled for curative-intent or systemic therapy (radiotherapy, ADT, chemotherapy, or combination).

PSMA PET Acquisition Protocol

Baseline scan: Performed prior to any treatment. Radiotracer: 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-DCFPyL, dose according to institutional guidelines, acquisition starting 60 minutes post-injection.

Follow-up scan: Triggered either by:

PSA recurrence: PSA rise ≥2 ng/mL above nadir after radiotherapy, or biochemical progression per PCWG3 criteria; OR

Fixed time window: 12-24 months after treatment completion (for patients without biochemical recurrence).

Consistency: Same radiotracer and scanner type will be used whenever possible. Images centrally collected and analyzed.

Quantitative PSMA PET Parameters (Primary)

SUVmax change: Maximum standardized uptake value measured in the most intense PSMA-avid lesion. Up to five lesions per patient may be recorded; the highest SUVmax is used for analysis. Absolute and relative (percentage) change from baseline to follow-up will be calculated.

PSMA-avid lesion count change: Total number of PSMA-avid lesions per patient, including primary tumor, nodal metastases, and bone metastases. Counting rules:

Primary tumor: counted as 1 lesion if present and PSMA-avid.

Lymph nodes: each distinct node with SUVmax \> liver background and typical morphology counted separately; contiguous nodal clusters counted as 1.

Bone metastases: each discrete focus counted separately; diffuse marrow involvement counted as 1 "marrow" lesion.

Excluded: sites of physiological uptake (e.g., salivary glands, bowel, renal collecting system).

Two independent nuclear medicine physicians will perform counts; discrepancies resolved by consensus.

Composite Reference Standard for Treatment Response

Treatment response (ground truth) will be categorized as: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) based on an adjudicated composite reference standard:

PSA kinetics: PSA50, PSA90, PSA nadir, time to PSA progression per PCWG3.

Conventional imaging: CT and bone scan, assessed per RECIST 1.1 (for soft tissue) and PCWG3 (for bone) by two independent radiologists blinded to PSMA PET results; disagreements resolved by a third reader.

Clinical outcomes: Need for treatment switch, occurrence of symptomatic progression, or death.

The composite standard will be determined by a clinical adjudication committee blinded to PSMA PET results.

Statistical Considerations (Detailed) Sample Size Justification

Target enrollment: 110 patients (allowing 10% loss to follow-up, aiming for 100 evaluable). Assumptions based on csPCa (Gleason ≥7) population:

Prognostic analysis: Expected 2-year progression rate 30% → \~30 events. With 100 patients, 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 2.0 between PSMA PET-defined responders and non-responders (two-sided alpha 0.05, log-rank test). This detectable HR is consistent with prior RECIP 1.0 validation studies (HR 3.2).

Concordance analysis: For Cohen's kappa, 100 patients yield a 95% CI half-width of ±0.10 when kappa ≈ 0.70, sufficient for agreement assessment.

Subgroup analyses: Descriptive only; no formal power calculation.

Statistical Analysis Plan

All analyses will be performed using R (version ≥4.2). The final SAP will be finalized before database lock.

Primary analysis:

Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) for log-transformed SUVmax and lesion count, with fixed effects for time point (baseline, follow-up), treatment type, and random intercept per patient.

Multinomial logistic regression to assess association between ΔSUVmax/Δlesion count and the composite reference standard response categories, adjusting for baseline disease volume.

Survival analysis:

Progression-free survival (PFS): time from treatment initiation to radiographic progression (per composite standard), PSA progression (PCWG3), or death.

Time to castration resistance (for ADT patients).

Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests comparing PFS between PSMA PET response groups (e.g., responders vs. non-responders, defined by ≥30% decrease in SUVmax or lesion count).

Cox proportional hazards models for baseline and follow-up parameters, adjusting for clinical covariates (PSA, Gleason, T stage, treatment type).

Agreement analysis:

Cohen's kappa with quadratic weights for agreement between PSMA PET response categories (binary or ordinal) and PSA response categories (PSA50, PSA90, PSA progression). Percent agreement and 95% CI reported.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Absolute and relative change in SUVmax from baseline to follow-up PSMA PET [Срок оценки: Baseline and follow-up (12-24 months post-treatment or at time of PSA recurrence); overall assessment up to 2 years.]
Вторичные конечные точки (8)
  • Proportion of patients with treatment strategy change following serial PSMA PET [Срок оценки: Up to 2 years]
  • Absolute and relative change in number of PSMA-avid lesions (supportive endpoint) [Срок оценки: Baseline and follow-up (12-24 months or at PSA recurrence); overall up to 2 years.]
  • Agreement between PSMA PET response and PSA50 response [Срок оценки: Up to 2 years]
  • Agreement between PSMA PET response and PSA90 response [Срок оценки: Up to 2 years]
  • Association of PSMA PET parameters with progression-free survival (PFS)(exploratory) [Срок оценки: Up to 2 years]
  • Association of baseline and follow-up PSMA PET parameters with time to castration resistance (exploratory, ADT patients only) [Срок оценки: Up to 2 years]
  • Subgroup analyses of PSMA PET parameter changes (exploratory) [Срок оценки: Up to 2 years]
  • Inter-reader agreement for PSMA-avid lesion counts (exploratory) [Срок оценки: Baseline]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥7 (clinically significant prostate cancer).
  • Planned to receive curative-intent therapy (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) or systemic therapy (androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, or combination).
  • Undergo baseline PSMA PET/CT imaging prior to any prostate cancer-related treatment.
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Willing and able to comply with the follow-up schedule, including the second PSMA PET/CT scan.
  • Provide written informed consent.

Критерии исключения

  • Any prior prostate cancer treatment (including hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery) before baseline PSMA PET/CT.
  • Contraindications to PSMA PET/CT imaging (e.g., known severe allergic reaction to radiotracer components, inability to lie flat for the duration of the scan).
  • Other active malignancy within the past two years, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer.
  • Severe comorbidities or conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with study compliance or pose a significant risk to the patient.
  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Модель наблюдения
Когортное

Центры проведения

Китай · 9 центров
  • The First Hospital of Lanzhou University — Lanzhou
  • General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University — Иньчуань
  • Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital — Xining
  • Weinan Central Hospital — Weinan
  • Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital — Сиань
  • Xijing 986 Hospital — Сиань
  • Xijing Hospital — Сиань
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine — Xianyang
  • … и ещё 1 центр

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07553780 · KY20262013-F-1

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗