Usability of the Regen Gait Therapy Robot in Healthy Adults
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Regen Rehabilitation Assistive Device.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Healthy Adult Participants. Базовые параметры: 18 лет — 50 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- США
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Обзор
Regen is a robot-assisted device designed to help therapists and improve the quality of treatment. It works by replicating the movement of the therapist and providing assistance as needed for the patient. This study aims to assess the safety, feasibility, usability, and ability to Regen to replicate the movement pattern of therapist in young healthy adults during treadmill walking.
Подробное описание
Physical therapy, despite its effectiveness, is a physically demanding profession that requires moderate to high physical and psychological work demands. A single session typically lasts close to an hour per patient, with a substantial portion dedicated to hands-on rehabilitation therapy, excluding assessment. Long sessions, repetitive manual motions, and awkward postures contribute to fatigue, risk of musculoskeletal strain, and limited treatment duration.
One of such physically demanding tasks in rehabilitation is gait training, which often requires therapists to provide continuous manual assistance to a patient's lower limbs during treadmill walking or overground training. This repetitive, non-ergonomic work not only accelerates therapist fatigue and low back pain but also restricts the number of gait cycles that can be practiced, thereby limiting patient outcomes. These challenges create a growing need for robotic technology that can share the physical workload while maintaining therapy quality.
Rehabilitation robotic technology ranges from exoskeletons to end-effector-based assisted training devices. These provide precision, repeatability, and adaptability beyond traditional therapy methods, while also providing sensory and motor feedback. Despite these advantages, current robotic devices still face significant barriers to widespread adoption. Most rehabilitation robots either provide fixed-repetitive motions, work on just one joint, or require extensive pre-programming, which limits adaptability and versatility to individual patient needs. Further, high equipment costs, the need for specialized staff training, and required adaptations to clinical infrastructure often limit their accessibility and scalability.
Regen offers a potential solution to these gaps. Regen is a medical robotic technology aimed at improving the strength and mobility of patients. This device consists of a human-interactive robot arm that connects patients via an arm or leg brace, providing therapeutic motions to patients. It works by replicating therapist-guided movements, extending therapy duration, and ensuring consistent motion delivery. Regen is unique in its "assist-as-needed" capability. This allows the therapist to directly teach and calibrate new trajectories for each user, set repetitions, and then run based on the patient's abilities. This adaptability not only supports patient progression but also enhances motivation for the patient. Thus, the system is more responsive to the real-world variability of therapy sessions.
Before such systems can be brought into clinical practice, it is essential to evaluate usability and validity. Usability assesses whether the system is acceptable, safe, and easy to use for both therapists and patients. Validity assesses the system's ability to accurately replicate therapeutic movement trajectories.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and usability of Regen in young healthy adults. The secondary aim is to assess the validity of the device in replicating therapist-guided movement using a marker-based motion capture system. The investigators hypothesize that Regen is a safe, usable, and valid tool for delivering therapist-like rehabilitation movements.
Вмешательства
- Устройство Regen Rehabilitation Assistive Device
Regen is a robotic gait therapy device that learns therapist-guided movement trajectories and autonomously reproduces them.
Первичные конечные точки
- System Usability Scale (SUS) [Срок оценки: During the experimental session (Day 1) and immediately post-task (within 10 minutes after completion)]
- NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) [Срок оценки: During the experimental session (Day 1) and immediately post-task (within 10 minutes after completion)]
- Device Acceptability (Likert Scale) [Срок оценки: Immediately post-task (within 10 minutes after completion, Day 1)]
- Qualitative Feedback on Device Usability and Safety [Срок оценки: Immediately post-task (within 10 minutes after completion, Day 1)]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Healthy study participants: adults (18-50 years) who can walk independently on a treadmill for at least 6 minutes
- Physical therapist (PT) with a license and experience in gait rehab (self-reported)
Критерии исключения
(1) For healthy study participants:
- Any neurological or orthopedic condition that can affect walking (Self-reported)
- Uncontrolled cardiovascular or metabolic condition that can affect walking (Self-reported)
- Current lower-limb pain or discomfort
- Lower-limb surgery within the past six months
- On medications that may impair balance (Self-reported)
- Open wound in the lower limb
(2) For PT:
- Not having license
- No experience in gait rehab
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Да
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Не применимо
- Модель
- Одна группа
- Маскирование
- Открытое
- Основная цель
- Оценка устройства
Центры проведения
США · 1 центр
- University of Texas at Austin — Austin
Публикации
- Zbytniewska M, Kanzler CM, Jordan L, Salzmann C, Liepert J, Lambercy O, Gassert R. Reliable and valid robot-assisted assessments of hand proprioceptive, motor and sensorimotor impairments after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jul 16;18(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00904-5. PMID 34271954
- Giansanti D. The Social Robot in Rehabilitation and Assistance: What Is the Future? Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 25;9(3):244. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030244. PMID 33668987
- Banyai AD, Brisan C. Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;12(17):1720. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171720. PMID 39273744
- Jing Q, Xing Y, Duan M, Guo P, Cai W, Gao Q, Gao R, Ji L, Lu J. Study on the Rehabilitation Therapist Estimation Under Institutional Perspective by Applying the Workload Indicators of Staffing Needs in the Aging Context. Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 16;10:929675. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.929675. eCollection 2022. PMID 35784252
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07547683 · STUDY00008251