Evaluating Interventional Radiology for Cancer Pain Management

Официальное название

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Interventional Radiology in the Management of Pain in Patients With Cancer

Обзор

Each year, the number of new cancer cases increases globally and the associated pain remains a major concern. The scientific literature shows that the prevalence and severity of cancer-related pain have decreased thanks to new therapeutic strategies and the efficacy of innovative treatments. Nevertheless, recent studies indicate that the prevalence of pain in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer remains high. Cancer-related pain presents various characteristics, both in terms of timing (inflammatory and mechanical) and types (nociceptive, neuropathic, mixed, or visceral). This diversity in presentation and pathophysiology makes the condition complex, both in terms of symptom assessment and therapeutic management, requiring a multidisciplinary and often multimodal approach. In addition to pharmacological approaches, several non-pharmacological techniques are used for this purpose, as the interventional radiology (IR), so-called minimally invasive technique. The role of IR is becoming increasingly important in pain management, particularly in the context of a growing number of cancer survivors, improved survival in the metastatic setting and the limited effectiveness of opioids. These techniques include neurolysis, embolization, consolidation techniques, ablation, and percutaneous cervical cordotomy. The objective of the RI-Lief study is to evaluate the impact of interventional radiology on improving the quality of life of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. As part of the study, interventional radiology will be included in the standard patient care. The only additional procedure introduced by the research is the administration of questionnaires.

Вмешательства

• Другое Self-reported questionnaires
  Self-reported questionnaires will be used to assess the patient's pain (using a Numerical Rating Scale and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory), satisfaction with pain management (Pain Treatment Satisfactory Scale) and the global quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire)

Первичные конечные точки

• Difference in pain intensity measured on a numerical scale before the interventional radiology procedure, and at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months afterward. [Срок оценки: Baseline, 7 days, 1 month and 3 months after the radiology intervention.]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

• Adult patient (age > 18 years);
• Patient with locally advanced or metastatic cancer undergoing active management, including palliative care;
• Patient with a clinically estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months;
• Patient receiving treatment with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy, or any other type of treatment for locally advanced or metastatic cancer;
• Patient undergoing an interventional radiology procedure for pain relief (including cases where pain relief is not the primary objective);
• Patient able to complete the proposed questionnaires.

Критерии исключения

• Patient with cancer in remission;
• Patient with cured cancer;
• Patient under routine follow-up.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Не применимо

Модель

Одна группа

Маскирование

Открытое

Основная цель

Другое

Центры проведения

Список центров уточняется — проверьте первичный протокол.

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07529314 · 69HCL25_1073

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗