Tele-Rehabilitation vs Conventional Rehabilitation for Cognitive Improvement in Stroke Survivors.
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Tele-rehabilitation, Conventional Rehabilitation.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Stroke, Cognitive Impairment, Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment. Базовые параметры: 50 лет — 80 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Пакистан
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Comparison Of Tele-Rehabilitation Versus Conventional Rehabilitation To Improve Cognition Among Stroke Survivor.
Обзор
This study aims to: * Compare tele-rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation for cognitive improvement after stroke. * Evaluate changes in cognitive function using standardized assessment tools. * Determine whether tele-rehabilitation is as effective as conventional therapy. * Improve evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for stroke survivors.
Подробное описание
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability and is frequently associated with cognitive impairments affecting attention, memory, executive function, and processing speed, which significantly reduce independence and quality of life among survivors. Cognitive rehabilitation plays a vital role in promoting neuroplasticity and functional recovery after stroke. Conventional rehabilitation, delivered through face-to-face clinical sessions, remains the standard approach; however, tele-rehabilitation has emerged as an accessible and innovative alternative that allows structured cognitive interventions to be delivered remotely using digital platforms. Despite increasing use of tele-rehabilitation, limited comparative evidence exists regarding its effectiveness versus conventional rehabilitation for cognitive improvement in stroke survivors. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation over a 8-weeks intervention period. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups receiving comparable intensity and frequency of cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive outcomes will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention using standardized tools such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and other validated measures such as Stroop Test. The findings of this study will contribute to evidence-based rehabilitation practices and help determine whether tele-rehabilitation can provide an effective alternative to conventional cognitive rehabilitation following stroke.
Вмешательства
- Поведенческое Tele-rehabilitation
Cognitive rehabilitation exercises delivered remotely using video-based sessions, targeting attention, memory, executive function, and processing speed. Sessions will be conducted over 8 weeks. - Поведенческое Conventional Rehabilitation
In-person cognitive rehabilitation exercises targeting attention, memory, executive function, and processing speed delivered in a clinical setting for 8 weeks.
Первичные конечные точки
- Change in Cognitive Function Measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [Срок оценки: Baseline]
- Change in Cognitive Function Measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [Срок оценки: After 8 weeks]
Вторичные конечные точки (2)
- Change in Executive Function Measured by stroop Test [Срок оценки: Baseline]
- Change in Executive Function Measured by stroop Test [Срок оценки: After 8 weeks]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Adults with age 50-80
- Diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within subacute to chronic phase.
- Moca Score 10-25 score atleast
- For tele-rehab must accessible to a digital device.
Критерии исключения
- History of neurodegenerative disorder e.g Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease
- Severe Cognitive Impairment
- Lack of access to or inability to use a digital device
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Распределение
- Рандомизированное
- Модель
- Параллельные группы
- Маскирование
- Открытое
- Основная цель
- Лечение
Центры проведения
Пакистан · 1 центр
- Riphah International University — Islamabad
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07504276 · REC/02263 Imran Amjad