Hyaluronic Acid in Endodontic Microsurgery

Background and Rationale:

Endodontic microsurgery is an established treatment for persistent apical periodontitis after non-surgical root canal treatment. Successful healing depends on appropriate surgical technique, infection control, and favorable soft and hard tissue regeneration. Cross-linked hyaluronic acid is a non-animal-origin biomaterial with hydrating, tissue-supportive, and bacteriostatic properties, and may support wound healing and tissue regeneration in oral surgery. In addition, it is stable at room temperature and radiolucent, which facilitates postoperative radiographic and CBCT evaluation.

The present study investigates whether adjunctive use of cross-linked hyaluronic acid during endodontic microsurgery improves clinical healing outcomes compared with standard endodontic microsurgery alone.

Scientific Question:

Does cross-linked hyaluronic acid improve hard and soft tissue regeneration in endodontic microsurgery?

Hypothesis:

The adjunctive use of cross-linked hyaluronic acid in endodontic microsurgery improves soft-tissue and bone-healing, reduces inflammation and postoperative pain, and enhances the long-term stability of surgical outcomes.

Study type: Interventional (Clinical Trial) Allocation: Randomized Intervention model: Parallel assignment Masking: Double-blinded (participant and outcome examiner/radiologist) Primary purpose: Treatment Setting: Single center Follow-up duration: 12 months

Study Population:

Adult patients (\>18 years) with apical periodontitis in maxillary or mandibular first molars, previously treated with non-surgical endodontic therapy at least 12 months prior to enrollment, and meeting predefined periodontal and radiographic eligibility criteria.

Interventions:

Test Group (n=30 teeth) Endodontic microsurgery (open flap debridement) with adjunctive application of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Hyadent BG, Regedent) into the osteotomy defect and under the flap before closure.

Control Group (n=30 teeth) Endodontic microsurgery (open flap debridement) with no adjunctive grafting/regenerative material.

Surgical Procedure (both groups):

All procedures will be performed under an operating microscope (Carl Zeiss Extaro 300) using a standardized microsurgical protocol under local anesthesia (articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000, 3.4 mL). The protocol includes:

Single flap approach (Trombelli 2009) combined with entire papilla preservation technique (Aslan et al.).

* Flap elevation * Osteotomy with Lindemann bur under irrigation * 3 mm root-end resection at approximately 90 degrees * Root-end staining with 1% methylene blue * Ultrasonic retrograde preparation * Granulation tissue removal * Hemostasis with epinephrine cotton pellets * Root-end filling with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA, Trioxident) * Irrigation with 0.9% sodium chloride * Periosteoplasty * Tension-free flap repositioning and suturing with 7-0 monofilament sutures (Prolene) * In the test group only, cross-linked hyaluronic acid will be applied via cannula to fill the osteotomy defect and placed beneath the flap prior to suturing.

Outcome Measures:

Primary Outcome: Early soft tissue healing Assessed on postoperative day 4 using the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS).

Secondary Outcomes

* Periapical healing on periapical radiographs (PA) Assessed by blinded evaluators using Molven criteria at 3, 6, and 12 months * Periapical healing on CBCT Assessed by blinded evaluators using PENN 3D criteria at 6 and 12 months * Cortical plate healing Assessed using the RAC/B index * Postoperative pain Assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Statistical Considerations

Sample size calculation was based on detecting a 2-point difference in the Early Wound Healing Score (range 0-10) between groups, assuming:

Alpha = 0.05 Power = 80% Standard deviation = 3 The calculated sample size was approximately 18 patients per group. To account for potential dropouts and ensure robustness, the final planned sample size is 23 patients per group. The protocol currently plans enrollment of 30 teeth per group, providing additional allowance for attrition and variability.

• The postoperative pain will be evaluated by visual analogue scale VAS [Срок оценки: within the two first weeks after surgery]
• Periapical healing assessed on periapical radiographs according to the Molven's criteria [Срок оценки: 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery]
• Pericapial healing on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans according to PENN's criteria [Срок оценки: 6 and 12 months post-surgery]
• Cortical plate healing [Срок оценки: 6 and 12 months post-surgery]