Меню
Набор скоро начнётся NCT07481500

Speculum-Free Intravitreal Injection Using Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction: A Randomized Trial of Pain, Procedure Time, Patient Satisfaction, and Safety

Без фазы С лечением Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) Diabetic Macular Edema Retinal Vein Occlusion Intravitreal Injections

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Eyelid Speculum Retraction, Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD), Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, Intravitreal Injections. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Список центров уточняется — проверьте первичный протокол.
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Speculum-Free Intravitreal Injection Using Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Pain Perception, Procedure Duration, Patient Satisfaction, and Safety Between Eyelid Speculum and Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction Techniques

Обзор

This randomized controlled trial compares two techniques for eyelid retraction during intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-VEGF agents: the standard wire eyelid speculum (Group A) versus cotton-tipped applicator retraction (Group B) in patients with neovascular AMD, diabetic macular edema, or retinal vein occlusion. The study evaluates four outcomes: (1) patient pain perception measured by a 10-cm visual analogue scale immediately after injection; (2) procedure duration from retraction device placement to removal; (3) patient satisfaction assessed by a 5-item Likert scale; and (4) safety including rates of subconjunctival hemorrhage, corneal abrasion, endophthalmitis, and intraocular pressure elevation. A novel syringe cap technique using the Terumo 31G insulin syringe plastic cap as an injection-site marker (3.5 mm for pseudophakic eyes, 5.0 mm for phakic eyes from the limbus) is employed in both groups, replacing the traditional caliper. Randomization is stratified by diagnosis and prior injection history using permuted block randomization (block sizes 4 and 6). The target sample size is 120 patients (60 per group) at Walailak University Hospital, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.

Подробное описание

Background:

Intravitreal injection is one of the most frequently performed ophthalmic procedures worldwide. Eyelid specula are standard for keeping the eye open during injection but may cause discomfort, corneal exposure, and patient anxiety. Cotton-tipped applicator retraction is an alternative technique that may reduce pain and improve patient experience, but comparative randomized data on procedure time, satisfaction, and safety are lacking.

Study Design:

Single-center, prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to speculum (Group A) or cotton-tipped applicator retraction (Group B). Stratified permuted block randomization is performed using Study Randomizer software with six strata: diagnosis (nAMD / DME / RVO) × prior injection history (injection-naïve / previously injected).

Interventions:

All patients receive standard preparation: topical tetracaine 0.5% (two instillations), 5% povidone-iodine ophthalmic drops (≥5 min contact), and 10% povidone-iodine periocular skin preparation. Anti-VEGF agents used are bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab (per clinical indication), injected via Terumo 31G insulin syringe at the superotemporal quadrant. Post-injection levofloxacin 0.5% drops are instilled immediately after needle withdrawal.

Outcome Measures:

Primary: Pain VAS (0-10 cm) immediately post-procedure; procedure duration (seconds) from retraction device placement to removal. Secondary: Patient satisfaction (5-item Likert scale, total 5-25); safety outcomes (subconjunctival hemorrhage, corneal abrasion, endophthalmitis, IOP elevation) at Day 0, Day 1 (telephone), and Week 4.

Blinding:

Patients cannot be blinded to retraction method. Pain VAS is assessed by an independent assessor blinded to group assignment. Procedure timing is recorded by a circulating nurse blinded to the randomization list.

Sample Size:

Based on Chen et al. (2025), assuming pooled SD of 1.71 for pain VAS (Cohen's d = 0.57), with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.025, power 80%), 52 patients per group are required for pain and 46 for procedure duration. With 15% dropout allowance, the final target is 60 patients per group (120 total).

Вмешательства

  • Процедура Eyelid Speculum Retraction
    A wire eyelid speculum is inserted to retract the eyelids prior to intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab) using a Terumo 31G insulin syringe at the superotemporal quadrant. The speculum is removed immediately after needle withdrawal.
  • Процедура Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction
    Two sterile cotton-tipped applicators are used to retract the eyelids (speculum-free) prior to intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab) using a Terumo 31G insulin syringe at the superotemporal quadrant. Applicators are removed immediately after needle withdrawal.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Pain Perception [Срок оценки: Immediately after intravitreal injection (Day 0)]
  • Procedure Duration [Срок оценки: During intravitreal injection procedure (Day 0)]
  • Patient Satisfaction [Срок оценки: 15-30 minutes after intravitreal injection (Day 0)]
  • Procedure-Related Complications [Срок оценки: Day 0, Day 1, and Week 4 post-injection]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO)
  • Scheduled for intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or faricimab)
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Критерии исключения

  • Active ocular infection or inflammation
  • Known allergy to povidone-iodine, tetracaine, or levofloxacin
  • Inability to cooperate with the injection procedure
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial
  • Anatomical eyelid abnormality precluding use of either retraction technique

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Рандомизированное
Модель
Параллельные группы
Маскирование
Простое слепое
Основная цель
Поддерживающая терапия

Центры проведения

Список центров уточняется — проверьте первичный протокол.

Публикации

  • Chen HRQ, de Andrade GC, Arimori LK, Lerner FK. Comparison of intravitreal injection techniques with and without a speculum using eyelid retraction with a cotton-tipped applicator. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025 Oct 29;11(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00739-5. PMID 41163036

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07481500 · WURCT5954

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗