The Impact of Pecha Kucha Pre-Lab Teaching on Students' Foley Catheterization Skills: A Randomized Controlled Study

Официальное название

The Effect of Pre-Laboratory Information Using the Pecha Kucha Technique on Students' Knowledge Level, Skill Performance, Application Time in Foley Catheterization Training: A Randomized Controlled Study

Обзор

Urinary catheterization is a common nursing procedure used to drain urine from the bladder. When performed with the correct indications and sterile technique, it can help protect a patient's health. However, errors during catheter insertion may lead to serious complications, especially catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). These infections are among the most common hospital-acquired infections and can increase hospital stay, health care costs, and complications for patients. Therefore, it is important for nursing students to learn this procedure safely and correctly. Traditional nursing education usually includes a lecture followed by a demonstration by an instructor. Students then practice the procedure themselves. However, new teaching approaches may help students learn complex clinical skills more effectively. Pecha Kucha is a short and structured presentation format. It includes 20 slides that automatically change every 20 seconds, and the presentation lasts 6 minutes and 40 seconds. This format encourages concise explanations and helps keep the audience focused. This study aims to compare a Pecha Kucha-based educational module with traditional teaching in urinary catheterization training for nursing students. Researchers will examine whether the Pecha Kucha method improves students' knowledge, skill performance, procedure time, and satisfaction with the training. The findings may help educators develop more effective and engaging teaching strategies for clinical skills education in nursing.

Подробное описание

All students first attended a theoretical course that included a lecture and an instructional video demonstrating the procedure. After the theoretical session, students were provided with reference textbooks and example videos to review and study independently at home. One week later, before the laboratory practice session, the students were divided into three groups and received different preparatory instructions in the laboratory setting.

The first group received a brief training session delivered using the Pecha Kucha presentation format. The second group received traditional instruction in which the procedure was demonstrated on a mannequin. The third group did not receive any additional demonstration in the laboratory and were expected to perform the procedure based only on the video they had previously watched.

Вмешательства

• Поведенческое Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation
  A short Pecha Kucha presentation (20 slides × 20 seconds) delivered before laboratory practice to reinforce procedural knowledge.
• Поведенческое Demonstration-Based Training
  Instructor demonstration of the procedure performed on a mannequin before laboratory practice.
• Поведенческое No Additional Training
  Students performed the laboratory procedure without receiving any additional pre-practice instruction.

Первичные конечные точки

• Skill Performance Scores [Срок оценки: Immediately after the intervention]

Вторичные конечные точки (2)

• Procedure Completion Time [Срок оценки: During the skill performance assessment immediately after the intervention.]
• Educational Satisfaction Level [Срок оценки: Immediately after the intervention.]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

Being a second-year nursing student enrolled in the "Fundamentals of Nursing" course with regular attendance.

Being 18 years of age or older. Volunteering and consenting to participate in the study. Not being a graduate of a Vocational School of Health Having no prior formal training or clinical experience regarding urinary catheterization skills.

Критерии исключения

Declining to participate in the research. Requesting to withdraw from the study at any stage of the data collection process after initially providing consent.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Рандомизированное

Модель

Параллельные группы

Маскирование

Двойное слепое

Основная цель

Другое

Центры проведения

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 центр

• University of Health Science Türkiye- Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing — Üsküdar

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07464496 · 4565

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗