Меню
Идёт набор NCT07449026

Interrater Reliability and Feasibility of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric for Use in Physical Therapy Simulation

— Наблюдательное Physical Therapy Education Clinical Judgement Assessment Simulation-based Learning

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Video Recorded Acute Care Simulation, Faculty Rating of Acute Care Simulation Video Using the LCJR-PT.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Physical Therapy Education, Clinical Judgement Assessment, Simulation-based Learning. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
США
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →

Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →

Официальное название

Reliability and Feasibility of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric Adapted for Physical Therapy (LCJR-PT) to Evaluate Clinical Judgment During Standardized Simulation Experiences in Doctor of Physical Therapy Students

Обзор

This study examines whether physical therapy faculty can reliably and feasibly use the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric adapted for physical therapy (LCJR-PT) to score students' clinical judgment during a recorded simulation experience. Multiple trained faculty raters will independently score the same student videos, and the level of agreement between raters will be measured. Faculty will also report how long scoring takes and their perceptions of the rubric's usefulness.

Подробное описание

Clinical judgment is a core competency for physical therapists required by the Commission on Accreditation of Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE), yet no validated, reliable tool specifically tested in physical therapy student populations currently exists for simulation-based assessment. The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), originally developed for nursing, implementing Tanner's clinical judgment model across four domains: noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting. This study adapts the LCJR for physical therapy (LCJR-PT) and examines its interrater reliability and feasibility when used to assess DPT students during a standardized acute care simulation.

First and second year DPT students at Youngstown State University will complete a scripted 30-35 minute acute care simulation followed by a brief reflection. Sessions will be video-recorded. Three to five trained faculty raters will independently score each recording using the LCJR-PT. Raters will undergo standardized training including rubric anchor review, practice scoring, and calibration discussion. Primary outcomes are intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for total and domain scores. Secondary outcomes include average rater scoring time per student and faculty perceptions of usability and feasibility assessed via questionnaire.

Вмешательства

  • Другое Video Recorded Acute Care Simulation
    Participants complete a routine, curriculum-based standardized acute care simulation (30-35 minutes including reflection).
  • Другое Faculty Rating of Acute Care Simulation Video Using the LCJR-PT
    Faculty members will assess and rate each student acute care simulation video using the LCJR-PT tool.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for LCJR-PT total and domain scores [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 6 months]
Вторичные конечные точки (2)
  • Rater Scoring Time [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 6 months]
  • Faculty Usability and Feasibility Perception [Срок оценки: Through study completion, an average of 6 months]

Критерии участия

Inclusion Criteria (Students):

  • Enrolled as a 1st or 2nd year DPT student at YSU
  • Provided informed consent

Inclusion Criteria (Faculty Raters):

  • Full-time faculty member teaching in the YSU DPT program
  • Provided informed consent

Exclusion Criteria (Students):

  • Did not provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria (Faculty):

\- Did not provide informed consent

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Модель наблюдения
Другое

Центры проведения

США · 1 центр
  • Youngstown State University — Youngstown

Публикации

  • Halliday DA, Patterson BJ. Rater Training and Assessment of Student Clinical Judgment: An Experimental Inquiry. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2025 Jul-Aug 01;46(4):209-215. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001399. Epub 2025 Apr 3. PMID 40179145
  • Rogers BA, Franklin AE. Lasater clinical judgment rubric reliability for scoring clinical judgment after observing asynchronous simulation and feasibility/usability with learners. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jun;125:105769. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105769. Epub 2023 Mar 6. PMID 36931008
  • Adamson KA, Gubrud P, Sideras S, Lasater K. Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Feb;51(2):66-73. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20111130-03. Epub 2011 Nov 30. PMID 22132718

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07449026 · 2026-56

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗