Ventilation-Perfusion Discrepancy Index Versus Conventional Anatomic-Physiologic Assessment for Target Lung Lobe Selection in Endobronchial Valve Placement: A Multicenter, Randomised Controlled Trial

Обзор

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a Ventilation-Perfusion Discrepancy Index (VQDI)-guided strategy for selecting the target lung lobe can improve outcomes compared to the standard strategy in patients with severe emphysema undergoing bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves (EBVs). The main question it aims to answer is: · Does selecting the target lobe based on the lowest VQDI (indicating the worst functional mismatch) lead to a higher rate of successful treatment response at 6 months compared to selecting the lobe based on the worst destruction on CT scan? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the VQDI-guided selection group to the conventional CT/Chartis-guided selection group to see which strategy results in more patients achieving significant improvement in both lung function and reduction in the size of the treated lobe. Participants will: * Undergo standard clinical assessments (lung function tests, CT scan, exercise test) and an additional V/Q SPECT/CT scan to calculate the VQDI. * Have their collateral ventilation status checked using the Chartis system during bronchoscopy. * Be randomly assigned to one of the two target lobe selection strategies. * Receive EBV placement in the selected lobe. * Attend follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure for check-ups, repeated lung function tests, questionnaires, and CT scans to assess their response to treatment.

Вмешательства

• Процедура VQDI-assisted target lung lobe selection strategy
  Participants in this arm undergo endobronchial valve (EBV) placement in a target lobe selected specifically based on functional imaging. Among all lobes confirmed to have no collateral ventilation (assessed by the Chartis system), the lobe with the lowest Ventilation-Perfusion Discrepancy Index (VQDI) - indicating the most severe mismatch between air flow and blood flow - is chosen for treatment. All other procedural aspects, screening assessments, and follow-up are identical to the comparator a
• Процедура Conventional target lung lobe selection strategy
  Participants in this arm undergo endobronchial valve (EBV) placement in a target lobe selected based on standard anatomical criteria. Among all lobes confirmed to have no collateral ventilation (assessed by the Chartis system), the lobe with the highest CT destruction score - indicating the most severe anatomical emphysema - is chosen for treatment. This reflects current standard-of-care practice. All other procedural aspects, screening assessments, and follow-up are identical to the experimenta

Первичные конечные точки

• Ventilation-Perfusion Discrepancy Index (VQDI) [Срок оценки: 6 month]

Вторичные конечные точки (3)

• St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) [Срок оценки: 1 year]
• FEV1 Post-bronchodilator Absolute Change [Срок оценки: 1 year]
• 6-minute Walk Distance [Срок оценки: 1 year]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

• Clinical and radiological evidence of emphysema
• Nonsmoking for 4 months prior to screening interview
• BMI less than 35 kg/m2
• Stable on current medication regimen
• Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between 15% and 45% of predicted value
• Residual Volume less than 175% predicted (determined by body plethysmography)
• Little or no collateral ventilation (CV-) as determined using the Chartis System

Критерии исключения

• Had two or more hospitalizations over the last year for a COPD exacerbation
• Had two or more hospitalizations over the last year for pneumonia
• Had a prior lung transplant, lung volume reduction surgery, bullectomy or lobectomy
• Had a heart attack or congestive heart failure within the last 6 months
• Have heart arrhythmia
• Is alpha-1 antitrypsin deficient

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Рандомизированное

Модель

Параллельные группы

Маскирование

Четверное слепое

Основная цель

Лечение

Центры проведения

Китай · 1 центр

• China-Japan Friendship Hospital — Пекин

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07403617 · SELECTION-I

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗