Набор по приглашению NCT07355452

Comparing Outcomes Of Single Layer Versus Multilayer Leg Closure Techniques Following Great Saphenous Vein Harvesting For CABG

Без фазы С лечением Surgical Wound Infection Hematoma Seroma Following Procedure Prolonged Hospital Stay

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают: В протоколе указаны: Multi-layer closure (MLC), singlelayer closure for leg wound.
Кому может быть актуально: Состояния в реестре: Surgical Wound Infection, Hematoma, Seroma Following Procedure, Prolonged Hospital Stay. Базовые параметры: 18 лет — 70 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить: Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится: Пакистан
Следующий шаг: Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →

Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →

Обзор

This study aims to address the knowledge gap by comparing the outcomes of single-layer and multi-layer leg closure techniques following great saphenous vein harvesting for Coronary artery bypass grafting. Research question: 1. Does single-layer closure compared to multi-layer closure result in better postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing great saphenous vein harvesting for CABG 2. To evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications (e.g., infection, hematoma, wound dehiscence, seroma) associated with single-layer vs. multi-layer closure techniques. participants will follow in OPD after 1 week , their wounds will be examined and assessment will be recorded.

Подробное описание

Research question:

1. Does single-layer closure compared to multi-layer closure result in better postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing great saphenous vein harvesting for CABG 2. To evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications (e.g., infection, hematoma, wound dehiscence, seroma) associated with single-layer vs. multi-layer closure techniques.

participants will follow in OPD after 1 week , their wounds will be examined and assessment will be recorded.

Primary Endpoints: ASEPSIS SCORE Secondary Endpoints: Length of hospital stay, infection, hematoma, wound dehiscence, seroma Follow-up at 2 weeks. Readmission for leg wound complications or interventions

Вмешательства

Процедура Multi-layer closure (MLC)
Coronary artery bypass grafting remains a cornerstone in the management of coronary artery disease, with frequent use of the great saphenous vein as a conduit. While surgical techniques for vein harvesting have evolved, the optimal closure method for the resulting incision remains controversial . The technique employed for closure after vein harvesting can vary, with single-layer and multi-layer closure techniques . Multi-layer closure has remained a standard approach providing adequate tissue a
Процедура singlelayer closure for leg wound
Multilayer closure for leg wound

Первичные конечные точки

Incidence of postoperative leg wound complications (e.g., infection, hematoma, wound dehiscence, seroma) associated with single-layer vs. multi-layer closure techniques [Срок оценки: 7 days]
Incidence of postoperative leg wound complications (e.g., infection, hematoma, wound dehiscence, seroma, re-suturing, readmission) associated with single-layer vs. multi-layer closure techniques [Срок оценки: 14 days]

Критерии участия

Sample Selection Sampling Technique: Non-probability consecutive sampling

Критерии включения

elective CABG
Both male and female patients
Patient of age between 18-70 years
Patients of consenting surgeons will be included in the study after elaboration of study protocol