Cost-effectiveness and Implementation of a Transdiagnostic Internet-based Intervention for Emotional Disorders in Community Care.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines mental health as "a state of well-being in which every individual realizes his or her potential, can cope with the stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to his or her community." Many people do not achieve this state of well-being, or even if they do, they lose it at some point in their lives. When this happens, it can take the form of a mental disorder, the most prevalent being depressive and anxiety disorders, which affect around 6% of the population in Spain, causing a major impact on their social, work, and personal lives. In the wake of the COVID pandemic, there has been greater awareness in society of the importance of mental health.

However, despite this and despite the availability of effective pharmacological and psychological treatments that can significantly alleviate the symptoms of many mental disorders, health systems are not responding adequately to people with mental disorders. A study exploring mental health care in 84 countries, including Spain (Moitra et al., 2022), found that only 23% of people with depression in high-income countries and 3% in middle-income countries received minimally adequate treatment for their problem. This indicates that the problem goes beyond a health issue; it is a social and ethical problem, since without adequate treatment, many mental disorders have very negative consequences that significantly reduce well-being, satisfaction, and quality of life and cause social inequalities.

Possible solutions include increasing the number of professionals and organizing the provision of services more efficiently, from prevention to specialized care, including primary care. In this regard, there is a very solid line of research that has shown that online psychological treatments are as effective as face-to-face treatments for people with moderate depression and anxiety disorders. This project is part of the objective of optimizing mental health services by incorporating an online treatment program in order to increase citizens' access to effective psychological treatments.

The researchers involved in this application form a team that combines healthcare work with scientific work in order to implement an online transdiagnostic treatment program, going beyond individual face-to-face therapy, increasing diversity in the ways psychotherapy is administered, being flexible, and expanding the range of services offered. The team at the Universitat Jaume I (UJI) has developed and validated the "UJI online transdiagnostic protocol" in rigorous clinical trials and with the collaboration of affected individuals (user-centered design), which is effective in the short and long term for depression and anxiety. Over the past year, the UJI team and the Mutua Terrassa team, through a transfer agreement, have integrated the program into Mutua's technology platform. This application aims to promote the adoption and sustainability of this program as an additional alternative available to mental health professionals at the two mental health centers run by Mutua Terrassa, which serve a population of more than 200,000 inhabitants.

The idea is to offer this program to people with moderate depression and/or anxiety so that professionals can intensify face-to-face care for other patients with more serious conditions. A clinical trial will be conducted to compare the effectiveness and costs of the online program with the usual treatment received by patients. In addition, the opinions of professionals and patients about the program will be evaluated, and the barriers and facilitators of incorporating the online program into services will be analyzed. The results will indicate the usefulness of this alternative. If the results are positive, an affordable, evidence-based alternative will be available that will increase the scope and scalability of treatments, which will be more integrated into people's daily lives, expanding the settings in which interventions are provided, with the acceptance of those involved. The project's actions include a plan to disseminate the results to society through social media networks belonging to both the UJI and Mutua; the organization of a specific conference on the project's results for primary care and specialist professionals at Mutua and another conference for patient and user associations; and holding meetings with managers who can make decisions about the sustainability of the program and its adoption in other services (General Directorate of Mental Health of the Valencian Community, management, health, and executive boards of Catsalut).

• Level of acceptability of the intervention using the System Usability Scale (SUS) [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Level of acceptability of the intervention using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Level of acceptability of the intervention using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire adapted to Internet-based interventions (CSQ-I). [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Level of feasibility of the intervention using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Level of feasibility of the intervention using passive data collected by the platform. [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Level of appropriateness of the intervention using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation measured quantitatively with the Pragmatic Context Assessment Tool (pCAT) [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation measured qualitatively with semi-structured interviews and focus groups [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Cost analysis - Initial technology investment costs [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Cost analysis - Direct costs using the ICT-P adult questionnaire [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]
• Cost analysis - Indirect costs using the Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) [Срок оценки: At the end of the intervention and follow-up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.]