Меню
Набор по приглашению NCT07326501

Attitudes and Perceptions of Corresponding Authors From Top International Medical Journals Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Scientific Process

— Наблюдательное Artificial Intelligence Biomedical Research Scientific Publishing Surveys and Questionnaires

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: observational survey.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Research, Scientific Publishing, Surveys and Questionnaires. Базовые параметры: Без ограничений · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Франция
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →

Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →

Обзор

"Artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models and conversational tools, is increasingly being used in medical research. These tools may assist researchers at different stages of the scientific process, such as generating research ideas, reviewing the literature, analyzing data, writing manuscripts, and preparing articles for publication. While interest in AI is growing rapidly, there is still limited information on how these tools are actually perceived and used by leading medical researchers. This study aims to better understand the attitudes, perceptions, and self-reported uses of artificial intelligence among corresponding authors who have published in six major international medical journals. These authors play a key role in shaping scientific standards and editorial practices, and their views are essential to understanding how AI may influence the future of medical research. Participants are invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire that asks about their familiarity with AI tools, how and when they use or plan to use them in the research process, the potential benefits they perceive, and the concerns or limitations they identify. The survey also explores participants' expectations regarding transparency, ethical guidance, and journal policies related to the use of artificial intelligence in scientific work.The study is observational and does not involve any medical intervention or collection of personal or health-related data. Participation is voluntary, and responses are fully anonymous.

Вмешательства

  • Другое observational survey
    This is an observational, non-interventional study based on an anonymous online questionnaire. No intervention is administered to participants.

Первичные конечные точки

  • Self-reported attitudes regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process [Срок оценки: At the inclusion]
  • Perceptions regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the scientific research process [Срок оценки: At the inclusion]
Вторичные конечные точки (4)
  • Self-reported patterns of use, regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing [Срок оценки: At the inclusion]
  • Perceived benefits regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing [Срок оценки: At the inclusion]
  • Risk regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing [Срок оценки: At the inclusion]
  • Expectations regarding artificial intelligence tools in scientific research and publishing [Срок оценки: At the inclusion]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Participants without any disease, condition, or related symptoms are permitted to participate. This study is a non-clinical, observational survey focusing on attitudes and practices related to artificial intelligence in scientific research, not on health conditions.

Критерии исключения

  • Authors who are not corresponding authors.
  • Students, residents, interns, or trainees without corresponding author status.
  • Individuals not involved in biomedical or medical research activities.
  • Individuals who decline to participate or do not complete the online questionnaire.

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Да

Дизайн исследования

Модель наблюдения
Только случаи

Центры проведения

Франция · 1 центр
  • CHU de NICE — Nice

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07326501 · 25Chirplast02

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗