Is Valacyclovir Non-inferior to Valganciclovir as CMV and EBV Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients? A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Pilot Study

Официальное название

Non-Inferiority Assessment of Valacyclovir Versus Valganciclovir as Prophylaxis Against CMV and EBV Viremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.

Обзор

Opportunistic CMV viremia (primary infection or reactivation) is usually managed by taking prophylactic medication for both adult and pediatric kidney transplant patients. Most hospitals prescribe valganciclovir for this purpose but valacyclovir has also been used. The most unfavorable side effect of valganciclovir is bone marrow suppression which can be troublesome for kidney transplant patients who are already immunosuppressed. We aim to assess the non-inferiority of valacyclovir compared with valganciclovir in this study.

Подробное описание

CMV viremia and EBV viremia are commonly seen in immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients. These patients are at highest risk for CMV or EBV viremia early post-transplant or during a period of heightened immunosuppressive regimen to treat acute rejection. CMV viremia could be asymptomatic when the viral load is low, but if uncontrolled, it could lead to severe organ-invasive disease. On the other hand, EBV viremia, though usually not an immediate threat to allograft, harbors risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD).Therefore, most transplant centers adopt regular surveillance as well as following certain protocols of antiviral prophylaxis, using valganciclovir specifically against CMV viremia.

Valganciclovir is highly effective as prophylaxis for CMV viremia, but it is also known for its side effects such as myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity. Valacyclovir, though better known for its therapeutic effect for herpes simplex virus, is emerging as an alternative to valganciclovir since some retrospective studies showing its comparative efficacy in CMV prophylaxis. Valacyclovir has favorable side effect profile, and is less expensive. It may also reduce EBV viral shedding in oropharynx, though there's no evidence showing its efficacy in preventing EBV viremia or even PTLD in kidney transplant patients. Given that there are scarce prospective studies comparing these two medications in kidney transplant recipients, our study aims to assess the non-inferiority of valacyclovir compared with valganciclovir as prophylaxis for CMV viremia and investigate its non-inferiority for EBV viremia. We will include both pediatric and adult kidney transplant recipients who received kidney transplant less than 5 years prior to study participation and the patients will be stratified based on their age, years post-transplant, and CMV risk status. Serum viral load and other possible side effects will be monitored during their clinic visits for at least 2 years. The findings from this study will be informative for the design and power calculations for a larger multicenter non-inferiority trial. If valacyclovir is indeed non-inferior to valgancyclovir in both CMV viremia and EBV viremia, utilizing this medication in our post-kidney transplant protocol may help reduce side effect burden and potentially save substantial healthcare cost.

Вмешательства

• Препарат Valacyclovir (Valtrex)
  Standard adult dose will be 1000 mg orally twice daily. For pediatric patients, dosing will be weight-based 20 mg/kg/dose twice daily; maximum dose: 1000 mg/dose. The exact dosage will be adjusted for renal function based on published guidelines.
• Препарат Valganciclovir (Valcyte)
  Dosing: Standard adult dose will be 450 mg orally once daily. For pediatric patients, dosing will be weight-based 15 mg/kg/dose once daily; maximum dose: 450 mg/dose. The exact dosage will be adjusted for renal function based on published guidelines. For pediatric patients who could not swallow pills, Valcyte also comes in the form of suspension (prepared by National Taiwan University Hospital in-house pharmacy).

Первичные конечные точки

• Time to new-onset CMV viremia [Срок оценки: up to 2 years]
• Time to new-onset EBV viremia [Срок оценки: up to 2 years]
• Cumulative incidence of new-onset CMV viremia [Срок оценки: 6 months, 1year, and 2 years]
• Cumulative incidence of new-onset EBV viremia [Срок оценки: 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years]

Вторичные конечные точки (5)

• Bone Marrow Suppression [Срок оценки: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years]
• Significantly declined renal function at 2 years post-transplant [Срок оценки: 2 years]
• Other adverse events during study period [Срок оценки: 2 years]
• Magnitude of Viral Load in New-Onset CMV Viremia [Срок оценки: 2 years]
• Magnitude of Viral Load in New-Onset EBV Viremia [Срок оценки: 2 years]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

• Age at least 3 years of age
• Patients who are about to receive or just received kidney transplantation within the past 2 weeks before the date of screening.
• Will be receiving prophylactic antiviral therapy against CMV and/or EBV per discretion of transplant surgeon
• No active CMV or EBV viremia (as defined by detectable viral load PCR) at the time of screening.
• Ability and willingness of the patient (or parent/legal guardian for minors) to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures.

Критерии исключения

• Severe co-morbidities that would preclude safe participation as judged by the transplant surgeon
• Pregnancy (valganciclovir is likely teratogenic)
• Known allergy to both valacyclovir and valganciclovir

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Рандомизированное

Модель

Параллельные группы

Маскирование

Открытое

Основная цель

Профилактика

Центры проведения

Тайвань · 1 центр

• National Taiwan University Hospital — Taipei

Публикации

• Kim JS, Lee NR, Park KI, Hwang HS, Lee SH, Chung BH, Jung CW, Cho JH, Park WY, Kim HJ, Jeong JC, Yang J, Lee YH, Park JB, Jeon JS, Lee J, Kim YH, Choi SJN, Oh J, Yoon HE, Kim DG, Shin HS, Ban TH, Kim MS, Ko MJ, Jeong KH; KOTRY study group. Valacyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation. BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10671-6 PMID 40045190
• Reischig T, Kacer M, Jindra P, Hes O, Lysak D, Bouda M. Randomized trial of valganciclovir versus valacyclovir prophylaxis for prevention of cytomegalovirus in renal transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):294-304. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07020714. Epub 2014 Nov 25. PMID 25424991
• Hoshino Y, Katano H, Zou P, Hohman P, Marques A, Tyring SK, Follmann D, Cohen JI. Long-term administration of valacyclovir reduces the number of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-infected B cells but not the number of EBV DNA copies per B cell in healthy volunteers. J Virol. 2009 Nov;83(22):11857-61. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01005-09. Epub 2009 Sep 9. PMID 19740997
• Cardoso LJC, Martins KAM, Marques PV, Teixeira IPS, Magalhaes E, Minkauskas JL, Faria IC, Ribeiro FM. Valacyclovir versus valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. Clin Transplant Res. 2025 Mar 31;39(1):24-35. doi: 10.4285/ctr.24.0034. Epub 2024 Nov 8. PMID 39510821

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07294547 · 202507077MINB

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗