REDS SCORE VERSUS qSOFA SCORE to Predict Mortality in Patients With Suspected Sepsis
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Sphygmomanometer.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Sepsis in ED Patients. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Египет
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Risk-stratification of Emergency Department Suspected Sepsis (REDS) Score Versus Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score to Predict Mortality in Patients With Suspected Sepsis
Обзор
Our goal in this work is to compare the predictive accuracy of the REDS score versus qSOFA in identifying in-hospital mortality among ED patients with suspected sepsis and improving outcomes in ED patients.
Подробное описание
Sepsis is a life threatening condition and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in emergency department worldwide.Patients at high-risk of death may be identified by using an evidence based risk-stratification score. The ED is a busy and hard environment and any score that is used should be easy to calculate using readily available variables. The objective criteria defining sepsis, a minimum two-point increase as in qSoFA score .
The REDS (Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis) score is a tool used to assess the risk of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. It combines several factors including age, altered mental state, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, serum albumin, INR, lactate levels, and refractory hypotension. A score of 3 or more is considered high-risk. Our goal in this work is to compare the predictive accuracy of the REDS score versus qSOFA in identifying in-hospital mortality among ED patients with suspected sepsis and improving outcomes in ED patients.
The REDS score includes the following variables, each assigned a point value:
Age: ≥ 65 years old (1 point) Altered Mental State: (1 point) Respiratory Rate: ≥ 22 breaths/min (1 point) Systolic Blood Pressure: ≤ 100 mm Hg (1 point) Serum Albumin: ≤ 27 g/L (1 point) INR: ≥ 1.3 (1 point) Lactate: 2.1-3.9 mmol/L (1 point), ≥ 4 mmol/L (3 points) Refractory Hypotension: (2 points for lactate ≤ 2 mmol/L, 3 points for lactate \>2 mmol/L)
Interpreting the REDS score:
0-2: Low risk of death 3 or more: High risk of death The REDS score is a useful tool for emergency departments to quickly identify patients who may be at higher risk of mortality from sepsis and need more aggressive or immediate treatment.The quick SOFA (qSOFA) score is a bedside tool used to quickly assess the risk of death or prolonged intensive care unit stay in patients with suspected infection. It uses three criteria: respiratory rate, altered mental status, and systolic blood pressure. A score of 2 or more indicates a higher risk.
qSOFA Criteria:
1. Respiratory Rate: 22 breaths per minute or higher. 2. Altered Mental Status: A Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15. 3. Systolic Blood Pressure: 100 mmHg or lower.
Scoring:
Each criterion met scores 1 point. A score of 2 or more indicates a higher risk of poor outcome. qSOFA helps identify patients with suspected infection who are likely to have sepsis. It is a rapid assessment tool that can be used in urgent and resource-limited settings
Вмешательства
- Устройство Sphygmomanometer
Mercury sphygmomanometer for measuring blood pressure
Первичные конечные точки
- Primary outcome [Срок оценки: 30 day]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Adults ≥ 18 y presented to the ED with suspected or confirmed infection, both sex qSOFA criterion met on arrival ≥ 2
Критерии исключения
- Patient less than 18 years Incomplete vital sign records upon ED arrival Pregnant patients Those with DNR state Immune compromised patient as leukemia
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Модель наблюдения
- Когортное
Центры проведения
Египет · 1 центр
- Assiut — Asyut
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07271329 · Reds score versus qSOFA score