Меню
Набор скоро начнётся NCT07269067

Automated vs Manual Flow-cytometry Gating for Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (DUALFLOW)

Наблюдательное Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Conventional gating, Automated gating.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute. Базовые параметры: Без ограничений · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
Список центров уточняется — проверьте первичный протокол.
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Assessing Concordance Between Manual Gating and Unsupervised FlowSOM Gating for Minimal Residual Disease Detection by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry in Adult and Paediatric Acute Myeloid Leukaemia

Обзор

This retrospective multicentre cohort evaluates the agreement of measurable residual disease (MRD) detection in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) using two flow-cytometry gating approaches. Manual expert gating is compared with an unsupervised FlowSOM clustering algorithm across post-induction and post-consolidation samples from 50 adults and 10 paediatric patients treated at Bordeaux University Hospital. The primary hypothesis states that unsupervised gating detects MRD ≥ 0.1 % with sensitivity and specificity comparable to manual gating.

Подробное описание

Acute myeloid leukaemia remains associated with high relapse rates despite complete remission after induction chemotherapy. Sensitive identification of residual leukaemic blasts (MRD) guides risk-adapted therapy. Flow cytometry is applicable to nearly all patients but relies on operator-dependent manual gating, which may lack reproducibility when rare or immunophenotypically atypical blasts are present. A data-driven alternative based on FlowSOM clustering was developed at Bordeaux to overcome these limitations. DualFlow retrospectively analyses paired flow-cytometry standard (FCS) files from 60 AML patients (≈ 100 MRD determinations) drawn from the DATAML Bordeaux adult database and the paediatric haemato-oncology service. Files are distributed to three partner centers for blinded re-analysis. Each sample undergoes: (1) conventional manual gating in two expert centers; (2) unsupervised FlowSOM gating in one center; (3) molecular MRD assessment when available. Primary analysis calculates sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and Cohen/Fleiss kappa for MRD ≥ 0.1 %. Secondary analyses include concordance with molecular MRD, Bland-Altman and correlation for MRD 0.01-0.1 %, impact on relapse-free and overall survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models, and operator reproducibility for manual gating. Covariate effects (age, cytogenetics, molecular risk, treatment) are explored through stratified and multivariable methods. No additional interventions or specimens are collected; only de-identified FCS files and routine clinical data are used.

Вмешательства

  • Диагностический тест Conventional gating
    Manual expert gating of multiparameter flow-cytometry data for MRD
  • Диагностический тест Automated gating
    Unsupervised FlowSOM gating of multiparameter flow-cytometry data for MRD

Первичные конечные точки

  • Concordance of MRD ≥ 0.1 % between manual gating and unsupervised FlowSOM gating [Срок оценки: up to 8 weeks after initiation first cycle of intensive therapy and after initiation of second cycle of intensive therapy]
Вторичные конечные точки (4)
  • Concordance of flow-cytometry MRD (both methods) with molecular MRD [Срок оценки: up to 8 weeks after initiation first cycle of intensive therapy and after initiation of second cycle of intensive therapy]
  • Agreement of MRD 0.01-0.1 % between manual and unsupervised gating [Срок оценки: up to 8 weeks after initiation first cycle of intensive therapy and after initiation of second cycle of intensive therapy]
  • Concordance of flow-cytometry MRD (both methods) with molecular MRD [Срок оценки: From diagnosis up to 60 months]
  • Inter-operator reproducibility of manual gating [Срок оценки: up to 8 weeks after initiation first cycle of intensive therapy and after initiation of second cycle of intensive therapy]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • Confirmed diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia per ELN 2022
  • Age ≥ 18 years (adult cohort) or 0-20 years (paediatric cohort)
  • Inclusion in DATAML Bordeaux database or paediatric haemato-oncology records
  • Available flow-cytometry MRD data post-induction and post-consolidation 1
  • Non-opposition or consent for secondary use of data

Критерии исключения

  • AML subtypes M3, M6 or M7
  • Acute leukaemia of ambiguous lineage
  • Missing or unusable flow-cytometry files for required time points

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Модель наблюдения
Когортное

Центры проведения

Список центров уточняется — проверьте первичный протокол.

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07269067 · CHUBX 2025/033

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗