The Agenda-Setting for Kidney Disease Open Pilot Trial

Официальное название

Setting the Agenda: An Open Pilot of a Structured Clinical Visit Agenda-Setting Intervention for Rural-Residing People With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

Обзор

The goal of this open pilot is to practice using an intervention and surveys before a larger pilot stepped wedge clinical trial. The intervention the researchers plan to use is Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics, and it is a structured clinical agenda-setting intervention (SAS), or a customized list of discussion topics. The people the researchers are practicing using the SAS with have advanced CKD (stages 4-5), and many of them live in rural areas. The researchers will practice administering CKD Topics, along with survey questions. By doing the open pilot, the researchers will learn if they need to modify the steps they plan to take in the larger trial. The main questions the researchers aim to answer are: * Do the steps for identifying eligible participants work? * Do the steps for administering CKD Topics work? * Do the steps to administer survey questions work?

Подробное описание

In this open pilot, the researchers will administer a novel structured agenda-setting tool (SAS) called Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics. The researchers will determine if their procedures for screening eligible participants, administering the intervention, and administering outcome and other questionnaires are appropriate. Learnings from the open pilot will feed forward into procedures in a larger planned pilot stepped wedge feasibility trial.

This study only has one arm, the intervention arm. The intervention, CKD Topics, will be administered as a quality improvement intervention.

Future Directions: This open pilot will inform procedural changes in an upcoming pilot stepped wedge feasibility trial.

Вмешательства

• Поведенческое Chronic Kidney Disease Structured Agenda-Setting Tool
  Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics is a novel clinical visit agenda-setting intervention developed through participatory research methods for people with CKD living in rural areas. CKD Topics includes 8 structured discussion topic areas with the option for patients to consider and indicate their priority topic areas and take notes before, during, and after a clinical visit.

Первичные конечные точки

• Primary Feasibility Outcome: Intervention receipt [Срок оценки: Day 1]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

• Adults >18 years old who have been diagnosed with advanced CKD (stages 4-5).
• Care partners, clinicians and staff supporting these CKD patients who are willing and able to provide informed consent
• English-speaking
• Able to provide informed consent
• Patient must be attending outpatient visits \*(in-person and/or telehealth allowable).

Критерии исключения

• Children under 18 years old will not be included
• Non-English-speaking patients and/or care partners
• Patients on dialysis
• Individuals unable or unwilling to provide informed consent

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение

Не применимо

Модель

Одна группа

Маскирование

Открытое

Основная цель

Организация здравоохранения

Центры проведения

США · 2 центра

• Cheshire Medical Center/Dartmouth-Hitchcock — Keene
• Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center — Lebanon

Публикации

• Brashers DE, Haas SM, Neidig JL. The patient self-advocacy scale: measuring patient involvement in health care decision-making interactions. Health Commun. 1999;11(2):97-121. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1102_1. PMID 16370972
• Clayman ML, Pandit AU, Bergeron AR, Cameron KA, Ross E, Wolf MS. Ask, understand, remember: a brief measure of patient communication self-efficacy within clinical encounters. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):72-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.500349. PMID 20845194
• Frankel RM, Salyers MP, Bonfils KA, Oles SK, Matthias MS. Agenda setting in psychiatric consultations: an exploratory study. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Sep;36(3):195-201. doi: 10.1037/prj0000004. Epub 2013 Jul 1. PMID 23815174
• Gramling R, Stanek S, Ladwig S, Gajary-Coots E, Cimino J, Anderson W, Norton SA; AAHPM Research Committee Writing Group; Aslakson RA, Ast K, Elk R, Garner KK, Gramling R, Grudzen C, Kamal AH, Lamba S, LeBlanc TW, Rhodes RL, Roeland E, Schulman-Green D, Unroe KT. Feeling Heard and Understood: A Patient-Reported Quality Measure for the Inpatient Palliative Care Setting. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 F PMID 26596879
• Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015 Feb 6;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391. No abstract available. PMID 25662947
• Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jun 18. PMID 17574367
• Saunders CH, Durand MA, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Elwyn G. Psychometric assessment of the consideRATE questions, a new measure of serious illness experience, with an online simulation study. Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2581-2589. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 22. PMID 35260261
• Saunders CH, Durand MA, Scalia P, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Milne DW, Collison J, Bennett A, Wasp G, Nelson E, Elwyn G. "It helps us say what's important..." Developing Serious Illness Topics: A clinical visit agenda-setting tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Aug;113:107764. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107764. Epub 2023 Apr 18. PMID 37150152

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07221604 · STUDY02002598_2 · 1K01DK139400

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, США)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗