Robotic Emergency General Surgery Program
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: Emergency General surgery patients with robotic approach for the surgery.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Emergency General Surgery. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Франция
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Официальное название
Beginning of Robotic Emergency General Surgery Program at Nice University Hospital
Обзор
Background Abdominal surgical emergencies account for 20-30% of visceral surgery procedures. However, these emergencies are responsible for more than half of the morbidity in our discipline, with a surgical site infection rate four times higher than in elective surgery, and significantly higher rates of surgical revision and conversion (PMID: 34225343 and 27016997 and 27120712). In cases where minimally invasive surgery is converted to laparotomy, patients are three times more likely to be admitted to critical care units (PMID: 39966134). Visceral surgery currently represents the largest and fastest-growing discipline in robotic surgery. Robotic management of emergency general surgery has been described in the literature for several years, particularly in the United States. Robotic surgery allows a shift from open procedures to minimally invasive techniques or simplifies complex laparoscopic procedures. Several literature reviews and meta-analyses report decreased laparotomy rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and shorter average length of hospital stay (PMID: 38446451 and 38918109). Abdominal surgical emergencies account for 20-30% of visceral surgery procedures. However, these emergencies are responsible for more than half of the morbidity in our discipline, with a surgical site infection rate four times higher than in elective surgery, and significantly higher rates of surgical revision and conversion (PMID: 34225343 and 27016997 and 27120712). In cases where minimally invasive surgery is converted to laparotomy, patients are three times more likely to be admitted to critical care units (PMID: 39966134). Visceral surgery currently represents the largest and fastest-growing discipline in robotic surgery. Robotic management of emergency general surgery has been described in the literature for several years, particularly in the United States. Robotic surgery allows a shift from open procedures to minimally invasive techniques or simplifies complex laparoscopic procedures. Several literature reviews and meta-analyses report decreased laparotomy rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and shorter average length of hospital stay (PMID: 38446451 and 38918109).Primary Objective:To assess the implementation of a robotic surgery program for emergency visceral procedures (proof of feasibility in our university hospital). Secondary Objectives: Reduce perioperative morbidity, Reduce the rate of laparotomy, Reduce the average length of hospital stay (LOS), Reduce postoperative admission to critical care, Reduce operative time.
Вмешательства
- Процедура Emergency General surgery patients with robotic approach for the surgery
vPrimary Endpoint: The proportion of procedures performed robotically versus laparoscopically or via laparotomy for selected indications. Secondary Endpoints: A 5% change in perioperative morbidity, laparotomy rate, LOS, critical care admission rate, and operative time. Included Pathologies (for patients eligible for laparoscopy) : Acute cholecystitis with predictors of intraoperative difficulty. Bowel obstruction requiring bowel resection (in presence of CT signs of visceral compromise: poor en
Первичные конечные точки
- Implementation of a robotic surgery program for emergency visceral procedures [Срок оценки: Postoperative day 30]
Вторичные конечные точки (5)
- Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change perioperative morbidity) [Срок оценки: Postoperative day 30.]
- Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change the rate of laparotomy) [Срок оценки: Postoperative day 30]
- Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change the average length of hospital stay ) [Срок оценки: Postoperative day 30]
- Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change postoperative admission to critical care) [Срок оценки: Postoperative day 30]
- Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change operative time) [Срок оценки: Postoperative day 30]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Acute cholecystitis with predictors of intraoperative difficulty.
- Bowel obstruction requiring bowel resection (in presence of CT signs of visceral compromise: poor enhancement of bowel loops, pneumoperitoneum).
- Complicated acute diverticulitis with perforation and peritonitis.
- Penetrating abdominal trauma with hemodynamic stability requiring surgery (e.g., bowel resection-anastomosis).
- Right or left colectomy for other etiologies.
- Splenectomy in hemodynamically stable or embolized patients.
Критерии исключения
- Hemodynamic instability.
- Uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
- Acute cholecystitis without predictors of intraoperative difficulty.
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Модель наблюдения
- Когортное
Центры проведения
Франция · 1 центр
- CHU de NICE — Nice
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07202442 · 25Urgences01