Factors Associated With Early Readmission in Critical Care
Ориентир для пациента и семьи
Простыми словами
Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.
- Что изучают
- В протоколе указаны: No intervention.
- Кому может быть актуально
- Состояния в реестре: Early Readmission to the ICU. Базовые параметры: от 18 лет · Все.
- Что важно проверить
- Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
- Где проводится
- Франция
- Следующий шаг
- Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Не всё понятно в терминах? Прочитайте наш гид для пациентов →
Обзор
The COVID-19 health crisis has highlighted pre-existing challenges in patient flow management within healthcare facilities, especially in critical care units. This has sparked debate regarding the sufficiency of critical care beds in France, while drawing attention to the lack of downstream structures. Inefficient patient flow, leading to bed occupancy bottlenecks, has been correlated with both critical care length of stay and morbidity. Unplanned early readmission to critical care further exacerbates these strains and prolongs hospital length of stay. Currently, no standardized criteria are available to guide safe discharge from critical care. A recent Delphi consensus study proposed a set of criteria, although largely subjective. The primary outcome of the present study is to identify factors associated with unplanned early readmission to critical care within 48 hours of discharge. Delayed discharge from critical care represents another major bottleneck contributing to system strain. The secondary outcome of this study is therefore to assess the proportion of critical care beds occupied by patients deemed ready for discharge by the medical team, as well as to analyze the reasons underlying such delayed transfers.
Подробное описание
The COVID-19 health crisis has highlighted pre-existing challenges in patient flow management within healthcare facilities, especially in critical care units. This has sparked debate regarding the sufficiency of critical care beds in France, while drawing attention to the lack of downstream structures. Inefficient patient flow, leading to bed occupancy bottlenecks, has been correlated with both critical care length of stay and morbidity. Unplanned early readmission to critical care further exacerbates these strains and prolongs hospital length of stay. Currently, no standardized criteria are available to guide safe discharge from critical care. A recent Delphi consensus study proposed a set of criteria, although largely subjective. The primary outcome of the present study is to identify factors associated with unplanned early readmission to critical care within 48 hours of discharge. Delayed discharge from critical care represents another major bottleneck contributing to system strain. The secondary outcome of this study is therefore to assess the proportion of critical care beds occupied by patients deemed ready for discharge by the medical team, as well as to analyze the reasons underlying such delayed transfers.
Вмешательства
- Другое No intervention
Only observation
Первичные конечные точки
- Early Readmission to the ICU [Срок оценки: From the first day of recruitment to 48 hours after the end of recruitment]
Вторичные конечные точки (3)
- Readmission to the ICU [Срок оценки: From the first day of admission to 30 days of follow up]
- 30-days mortality [Срок оценки: From the first day of admission to 30 days of follow up]
- Rate of bed occupancy by patients deemed fit for discharged [Срок оценки: From the first day of the study to the 7th day of the study]
Критерии участия
Критерии включения
- Patients over 18 years of age
- Hospitalized or admitted to the ICU
Критерии исключения
- Objection to the use of their data (by patient or a relative when applicable)
- Patients under legal protection
Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.
Здоровые добровольцы: Нет
Дизайн исследования
- Модель наблюдения
- Другое
Центры проведения
Франция · 1 центр
- Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP — Paris
Идентификаторы
NCT: NCT07182916 · FRASC / 2025-08