Меню
Набор по приглашению NCT07179458

Criterion-learning Naming Treatment For Addressing Comprehension Deficits in Aphasia

Без фазы С лечением Aphasia

Ориентир для пациента и семьи

Простыми словами

Автоматическая сводка по структурированным данным реестра. Она помогает сориентироваться, но не заменяет официальный протокол или оценку врача.

Что изучают
В протоколе указаны: Criterion-learning practice.
Кому может быть актуально
Состояния в реестре: Aphasia. Базовые параметры: 18 лет — 89 лет · Все.
Что важно проверить
Возраст, диагноз и пол — только базовые ориентиры. Предыдущее лечение, анализы и другие обязательные условия указаны ниже в критериях участия.
Где проводится
США
Следующий шаг
Сохраните исследование, покажите его лечащему врачу и уточните актуальный статус у исследовательского центра. Расходы, документы и поездка →
Официальное название

Word Retrieval in Aphasia

Обзор

Aphasia is a disorder of spoken and written language, most commonly following a stroke. It is estimated that between 2.5 and 4 million Americans are living with aphasia today. A common problem in aphasia involves difficulty retrieving known words in the course of language production and comprehension. The overarching goal of this project is to develop and test early efficacy, efficiency, and the tolerability of a lexical treatment for aphasia in multiple-session regimens that are comprised of retrieval practice, distributed practice, and training dedicated to the elicitation of correct retrievals. The aim of this work is to add to and refine the evidence base for the implementation and optimization of these elements in the treatment of production and comprehension deficits in aphasia, and make important steps towards an ultimate goal of self-administered lexical treatment grounded in retrieval practice principles (RPP) to supplement traditional speech-language therapy that is appropriate for People with Aphasia (PWA) from a broad level of severity of lexical processing deficit in naming and/or comprehension. This project cumulatively builds on prior work to develop a theory of learning for lexical processing impairment in aphasia that aims to ultimately explain why and for whom familiar lexical treatments work, and how to maximize the benefits they confer.

Подробное описание

This study examines a retrieval practice-based naming treatment termed criterion learning. In criterion learning, each item's assigned criterion level dictates the number of times that item is correctly retrieved before it is dropped from further training within a session. Criterion learning optimally incorporates potent learning experiences, including spaced retrieval practice with emphasis on correct retrievals during training. The present study will provide critical observations for optimizing criterion learning for treating word processing deficits in people with aphasia. This study will recruit 20 community-dwelling individuals with aphasia, who will undergo comprehensive neuropsychological characterization. Subsequently, participants will engage in an experimental treatment designed to promote improvements in word processing deficits.

This study will examine transfer from two types of naming treatment to word comprehension performance. Each PWA will perform naming treatment in one session at different dosages with a test of comprehension performance administered approximately one week and one month following treatment. Main outcomes of interest will be degree of transfer of each type of naming treatment to comprehension performance.

Вмешательства

  • Поведенческое Criterion-learning practice
    The experiments will be presented on a computer. On each criterion-learning trial, a picture is presented and the participant is asked to try to produce the name for the object with or without a cue. Correct-answer feedback is provided. Criterion learning involves presenting a block of items in fixed order, and on each trial, the experimenter or a voice-recognition component will code the response during the trial as correct/incorrect. When the item reaches its assigned criterion level, it is dr

Первичные конечные точки

  • Trained comprehension items [Срок оценки: approximately one-week and one-month following treatment]
Вторичные конечные точки (3)
  • Trained naming items [Срок оценки: a single session held during a single day, scheduled at the participant's convenience but typically held within two weeks following pre-treatment assessment]
  • Trained comprehension items [Срок оценки: pre-treatment]
  • Untrained comprehension items [Срок оценки: pre-treatment, approximately one-week and one-month post-treatment]

Критерии участия

Критерии включения

  • English as a native or primary language
  • Adults with stroke who are at least 6 months post-onset
  • Exhibit semantic comprehension deficit, defined as a minimum of 80 errors on word-picture verification pre-test

Критерии исключения

  • History of comorbid neurological diagnoses, such as Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson's Disease
  • History of a learning disability that significantly impacted language development, such as developmental language disorder
  • Insufficient stamina to participate in the protocol

Критерии приведены из реестра в оригинале (на английском). Окончательную оценку соответствия проводит исследовательский центр.

Здоровые добровольцы: Нет

Дизайн исследования

Распределение
Не применимо
Модель
Одна группа
Маскирование
Открытое
Основная цель
Лечение

Центры проведения

США · 1 центр
  • Jefferson Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute — Elkins Park

Идентификаторы

NCT: NCT07179458 · 4526.4 · R01DC015516

Первоисточники (государственные реестры)

Открыть это исследование на ClinicalTrials.gov ↗